Atlanta firefighter-pay proposal listed for Oct. 14 committee review
The proposal seeks competitive pay and funding authority. Its agenda listing does not establish an approved raise or guarantee a vote.
Archive
Loading articles…
Loading articles…
Browse our reporting by community, topic, and date.
966 published articles
Latest ·76–100 of 966
The proposal seeks competitive pay and funding authority. Its agenda listing does not establish an approved raise or guarantee a vote.
Staff backed a delay for a required neighborhood meeting. An Oct. 12 city letter assigns a Nov. 5 return, but the published agenda omits the case.
The packet lists an Oct. 19 Council checkpoint. Cooperative purchasing offers a stated discount, but Atlanta's software package and actual savings remain unverified.
A September report says the front-yard parking pad and drive were already built. Staff urged denial, but the board postponed the request.
The held proposal concerns properties in unincorporated DeKalb. The committee listing is a checkpoint, not a promised vote or an approved boundary change.
Atlanta’s zoning board docket names Nicholas Whitson as appellant but does not identify the contested ruling or his grounds for challenging it.
Atlanta’s zoning board set a return date after the applicant sought more time to work with the neighborhood. The setback exceptions remain unapproved.
The held proposal would examine housing, food access and other priorities alongside effects on water bills and infrastructure. It would not authorize a shift in tax proceeds.
The draft describes shared meals, expenses and responsibilities as traits of an unrelated household. The Oct. 12 committee referral was not adoption, and the exact occupancy change remains unverified.
The held donation would support repairs for homeowners at risk of unsafe conditions or displacement. The proposal calls for a fiscal 2027 payment through a housing trust account.
The zoning agenda lists 62.77% lot coverage, while an Oct. 12 notice says 61.8%. Both exceed the 50% limit; the board has postponed, not approved, the request.
Atlanta’s zoning board is scheduled to consider the corner-property request Nov. 5. The agenda lists requested permission, not approval.
The application at 36 Whitefoord Avenue NE also asks to cut the rear setback from 15 feet to seven. The agenda lists a request, not approval.
The zoning board postponed the case Oct. 1. Its new notice gives a return date but leaves the underlying dispute—and a conflicting sign-posting deadline—unexplained.
The held measure has an Oct. 14 committee checkpoint. It expressly includes data centers, but limits changes to existing incentive deals.
The ordinance in the Oct. 5 packet would support street outreach and rehousing, but specifies neither a donation amount nor funding accounts. The measure remains held.
Atlanta’s Oct. 12 draft minutes record another hold at 1607 Lakewood Avenue SE. The housing assessment and proposed ordinance disagree on the zoning change.
Atlanta’s zoning board lists the corner-property addition for Nov. 5 review. The agenda describes the requested exception, not an approval.
Atlanta’s zoning board lists the request for Nov. 5. The agenda identifies the location exception but does not show the pool’s dimensions or screening plan.
The bridge-and-stairs case is scheduled for Atlanta zoning board review Nov. 5 with seven requested exceptions, including permission for an 11.2-foot side-yard wall.
Atlanta’s Oct. 5 council packet lists the held measure for Finance/Executive Committee consideration. Its ordinance leaves the financial scale unspecified.
The $357,826 increase goes entirely to airport work. The six-month proposal would waive supplier-selection rules while the city completes a replacement procurement.
The substitute would end the remedy upon full adoption of advanced metering. Customers would still need usage records and a timely no-leak inspection; Council action is pending.
The Oct. 13 recommendation advances repairs for up to three clarifiers. Full Council consideration remains pending, and the proposal does not quantify recovered capacity or set an installation timetable.
The unanimous recommendation sends the borrowing proposal toward Council review Oct. 19. Watershed Management says it has identified no lead service lines so far.
Dates shown are publication dates. Report states describe that article’s evidence, not the current status of a project. Coverage varies by community; this is not a complete inventory of local activity.
Another place. Another story.