NickO Report
CitiesExplore

WHO'S GOT SOUL receives B in Gwinnett County health inspection

Inspected

1098 Herrington Rd Suite 14 Lawrenceville, GA 30044

Map ↗

WHO'S GOT SOUL received a B, scoring 85 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Oct 1, 2026. The official report lists seven findings. [1]

Inspection score

85/100Grade BOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The report states: “Person in charge could not demonstrate in a verifiable manner that randomly selected employee had been informed of their responsibility to report certain symptoms and illnesses.// Food employees and conditional employees shall be informed in a verifiable manner of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities as they relate to diseases that are transmissible through food.” [2]

The inspector also observed accumulation of black mold-like substance on interior surfaces of ice machine.// Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. [3]

A separate finding described an employee preparing food while wearing a bracelet on wrist. [4]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 7 of 7 findings

  1. Employee health reporting

    Item 2-2A
    Person in charge could not demonstrate in a verifiable manner that randomly selected employee had been informed of their responsibility to report certain symptoms and illnesses.// Food employees and conditional employees shall be informed in a verifiable manner of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities as they relate to diseases that are transmissible through food. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Employee signed a health agreement during inspection.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(2)(o)

    Person in charge could not demonstrate in a verifiable manner that randomly selected employee had been informed of their responsibility to report certain symptoms and illnesses.// Food employees and conditional employees shall be informed in a verifiable manner of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities as they relate to diseases that are transmissible through food. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Employee signed a health agreement during inspection.//
    Official report · Item 2-2A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Food-contact surface sanitation

    Item 4-2B
    Observed accumulation of black mold-like substance on interior surfaces of ice machine.// Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. (Pf)
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .05(7)(a)1

    Observed accumulation of black mold-like substance on interior surfaces of ice machine.// Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. (Pf)
    Official report · Item 4-2B ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  3. Personal cleanliness

    Item 12B
    Observed employee preparing food while wearing a bracelet on wrist. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION***.// Food employees may not wear jewelry including medical information jewelry on their arms and hands while preparing food (except for a plain ring such as a wedding band). (C) Corrective Actions: Employee removed bracelet.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(5)(h)

    Observed employee preparing food while wearing a bracelet on wrist. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION***.// Food employees may not wear jewelry including medical information jewelry on their arms and hands while preparing food (except for a plain ring such as a wedding band). (C) Corrective Actions: Employee removed bracelet.//
    Official report · Item 12B ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  4. Wiping cloth use and storage

    Item 12C
    Observed several wet wiping cloths stored in quat sanitizer below 200ppm (per manufacturer's instructions) between uses. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION***// Cloths in-use for wiping counters and other equipment surfaces shall be stored in sanitizer of the appropriate concentration in-between uses and laundered daily. (C) Corrective Actions: Sanitizer was remade to appropriate concentration. NOTE: Observed quat sanitizer is dispensed from sink at approximately 200ppm. Advised person in charge to ensure quat sanitizer is dispensed closer to 400ppm so that it still remains at the proper concentration after placing wiping cloths in it and using it multiple times.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(4)(m)

    Observed several wet wiping cloths stored in quat sanitizer below 200ppm (per manufacturer's instructions) between uses. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION***// Cloths in-use for wiping counters and other equipment surfaces shall be stored in sanitizer of the appropriate concentration in-between uses and laundered daily. (C) Corrective Actions: Sanitizer was remade to appropriate concentration. NOTE: Observed quat sanitizer is dispensed from sink at approximately 200ppm. Advised person in charge to ensure quat sanitizer is dispensed closer to 400ppm so that it still remains at the proper concentration after placing wiping cloths in it and using it multiple times.//
    Official report · Item 12C ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  5. Equipment design and condition

    Item 15A
    Observed water leaking from condenser in standing cooler next to back door.// Equipment shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under subsections .05(1) and .05(2) . (C)
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .05(6)(a)

    Observed water leaking from condenser in standing cooler next to back door.// Equipment shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under subsections .05(1) and .05(2) . (C)
    Official report · Item 15A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  6. Warewashing facilities and test strips

    Item 15B
    Person in charge could not provide chlorine test strips for measuring sanitizer concentration in chemical warewashing machine.// A test kit or other device that accurately measures the concentration in mg/L (or ppm) of sanitizing solutions shall be provided. (Pf)
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .05(3)(h),(i)

    Person in charge could not provide chlorine test strips for measuring sanitizer concentration in chemical warewashing machine.// A test kit or other device that accurately measures the concentration in mg/L (or ppm) of sanitizing solutions shall be provided. (Pf)
    Official report · Item 15B ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  7. Water supply and pressure

    Item 16A
    Facility has installed a new warewashing machine without obtaining approval from Health Authority.// Hot water generation and distribution systems shall be sufficient to meet the peak hot water demands throughout the food service establishment. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Facility must submit a remodel application by 10/6/26. Failure to submit application will result in permit supsension.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .06(1)(g),(h)

    Facility has installed a new warewashing machine without obtaining approval from Health Authority.// Hot water generation and distribution systems shall be sufficient to meet the peak hot water demands throughout the food service establishment. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Facility must submit a remodel application by 10/6/26. Failure to submit application will result in permit supsension.//
    Official report · Item 16A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    85/100B
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
AEA24484-6971-4DFA-9F8D-509D469BE9B7
Facility ID
D66B6B1C-1D60-47CF-BD93-68AA63FCB85B
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked