NICKO REPORT
CitiesExplore

FAROOJ ABO AL ABED receives B in Gwinnett County health inspection

Inspected

860 Duluth Hwy Suite1050 Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Map ↗

FAROOJ ABO AL ABED received a B, scoring 85 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Sep 8, 2026. The official report lists four findings. [1]

Inspection score

85/100Grade BOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The report states: “There was no person in charge (PIC) present at the beginning of inspection.// There must be a person in charge on the premises of the food service establishment at all times.” [2]

The report states: “The PIC could not demonstrate in a verifiable manner that any employees have been informed of their responsibility to report certain symptoms and foodborne illnesses.” [3]

A separate finding described a sanitizer bucket and food utensils (knife, grill brush) in the handwashing sink by the three compartment sink. [4]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 4 of 4 findings

  1. Person in charge

    Item 1-2A
    There was no person in charge (PIC) present at the beginning of inspection.// There must be a person in charge on the premises of the food service establishment at all times. (Pf) Corrective Actions: A person in charge (PIC) was designated. Two more PIC arrived during the inspection. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION OF THE SAME CODE PROVISION.***//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(2)

    There was no person in charge (PIC) present at the beginning of inspection.// There must be a person in charge on the premises of the food service establishment at all times. (Pf) Corrective Actions: A person in charge (PIC) was designated. Two more PIC arrived during the inspection. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION OF THE SAME CODE PROVISION.***//
    Official report · Item 1-2A
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Employee health reporting

    Item 2-2A
    The PIC could not demonstrate in a verifiable manner that any employees have been informed of their responsibility to report certain symptoms and foodborne illnesses. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION OF THE SAME CODE PROVISION***// Food employees and conditional employees shall be informed in a verifiable manner of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities as they relate to diseases that are transmissible through food. (Pf) Corrective Actions: The PIC and co-owner had all of the employees sign the employee health agreement forms during the inspection.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(2)(o)

    The PIC could not demonstrate in a verifiable manner that any employees have been informed of their responsibility to report certain symptoms and foodborne illnesses. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION OF THE SAME CODE PROVISION***// Food employees and conditional employees shall be informed in a verifiable manner of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities as they relate to diseases that are transmissible through food. (Pf) Corrective Actions: The PIC and co-owner had all of the employees sign the employee health agreement forms during the inspection.//
    Official report · Item 2-2A
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  3. Handwashing

    Item 2-2D
    Observed a sanitizer bucket and food utensils (knife, grill brush) in the handwashing sink by the three compartment sink. **SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION OF THE SAME CODE PROVISION***// A handwashing sink shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for employee use and not used for purposes other than handwashing. An automatic handwashing facility shall be used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. (Pf) Corrective Actions: The items were removed and the hand sink was sanitized.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .06(2)(o)

    Observed a sanitizer bucket and food utensils (knife, grill brush) in the handwashing sink by the three compartment sink. **SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION OF THE SAME CODE PROVISION***// A handwashing sink shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for employee use and not used for purposes other than handwashing. An automatic handwashing facility shall be used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. (Pf) Corrective Actions: The items were removed and the hand sink was sanitized.//
    Official report · Item 2-2D
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  4. Personal cleanliness

    Item 12B
    Observed a food employee prepare food with a watch on.// Food employees may not wear jewelry including medical information jewelry on their arms and hands while preparing food (except for a plain ring such as a wedding band). (C) Corrective Actions: The watch was removed.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(5)(h)

    Observed a food employee prepare food with a watch on.// Food employees may not wear jewelry including medical information jewelry on their arms and hands while preparing food (except for a plain ring such as a wedding band). (C) Corrective Actions: The watch was removed.//
    Official report · Item 12B
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    85/100B
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
A5389FD4-0646-4B5E-A354-D636FB4D846B
Facility ID
4A146A9B-4BBB-4BD6-93F7-0FEE3AAAA9DD
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked