NICKO REPORT
CitiesExplore

CHINA INN receives B in Cobb County health inspection

Inspected

1025 VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY STE 510 MABLETON, GA 30126

Map ↗

CHINA INN received a B, scoring 83 out of 100, in a Cobb County food-service inspection on Sep 21, 2026. The official report lists four findings. [1]

Inspection score

83/100Grade BOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed wontons, tofu, and eggs holding above 41f in the bottom of the prep top cooler in the main kitchen. [2]

The inspector also observed pic intention to use TPHC procedures for fried chicken wings,general tso chicken, and rice however no discard dates are on food items. [3]

The report states: “Facility did not have a thermometer on site that can be used to take the temperature of food.” [4]

The report marks three findings as corrected on site. One finding is marked as a repeat violation. [5]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 4 of 4 findings

  1. Cold holding

    Item 6-1A
    Observed wontons, tofu, and eggs holding above 41f in the bottom of the prep top cooler in the main kitchen. Observed cut cabbage holding at 68f on the prep table in the main kitchen.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.04(6)(f)

    Observed wontons, tofu, and eggs holding above 41f in the bottom of the prep top cooler in the main kitchen. Observed cut cabbage holding at 68f on the prep table in the main kitchen. C/A: TCS foods shall be maintained at 41f or below when cold holding. COS: Items discarded. Corrected On-Site. Repeat Violation.
    Official report · Item 6-1A
    Corrected on siteRepeat violation
  2. Time as a public health control

    Item 6-1D
    Observed pic intention to use TPHC procedures for fried chicken wings,general tso chicken, and rice however no discard dates are on food items. CA: When using the TPHC procedure, time of discard shall be labeled to monitor the food.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.04(6)(i)

    Observed pic intention to use TPHC procedures for fried chicken wings,general tso chicken, and rice however no discard dates are on food items. CA: When using the TPHC procedure, time of discard shall be labeled to monitor the food. COS: Food labeled. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 6-1D
    Corrected on siteNew violation
  3. Thermometers

    Item 11D
    Facility did not have a thermometer on site that can be used to take the temperature of food. C/A: Food temperature measuring devices shall be provided and readily accessible for use in ensuring attainment and maintenance of food temperatures New Violation.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.05(3)(g)

    Facility did not have a thermometer on site that can be used to take the temperature of food. C/A: Food temperature measuring devices shall be provided and readily accessible for use in ensuring attainment and maintenance of food temperatures New Violation. Correct By: 10/01/2026
    Official report · Item 11D
    New violation

    Correct by

  4. Washing fruits and vegetables

    Item 12D
    Observed food employee washing raw chicken in vegetable prep sink. C/A: Produce sink shall be used for washing fruits and vegetables only.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.04(4)(g)

    Observed food employee washing raw chicken in vegetable prep sink. C/A: Produce sink shall be used for washing fruits and vegetables only. COS: food employee removed chicken from sink, washed and sanitized sink. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 12D
    Corrected on siteNew violation

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    83/100B
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Cobb County
Inspection ID
57553363
Facility ID
3165973
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Cobb County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked