NickO Report
CitiesExplore

MIRZA HOOKAH LOUNGE receives B in Gwinnett County health inspection

Inspected

1098 Herrington Rd Suite 2 Lawrenceville, GA 30044

Map ↗

MIRZA HOOKAH LOUNGE received a B, scoring 87 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Aug 31, 2026. The official report lists five findings. [1]

Inspection score

87/100Grade BOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The report states: “No person in charge was present when requested.// There must be a person in charge on the premises of the food service establishment at all times.” [2]

The report states: “Person in charge was not aware of all reportable symptoms and illnesses.// Person in charge shall explain their responsibility for preventing the transmission of foodborne disease by a food employee who has a disease or medical condition that may cause foodborne disease and can describe the symptoms associated with the diseases that are transmissible through food.” [3]

The report states: “Facility does not have a written notification identifying which major allergens are used in the facility.// 1.” [4]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 5 of 5 findings

  1. Person in charge

    Item 1-2A
    No person in charge was present when requested.// There must be a person in charge on the premises of the food service establishment at all times. (Pf) Corrective Actions: A person in charge was designated by EHS. Another person in charge arrived on site during inspection.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(2)

    No person in charge was present when requested.// There must be a person in charge on the premises of the food service establishment at all times. (Pf) Corrective Actions: A person in charge was designated by EHS. Another person in charge arrived on site during inspection.//
    Official report · Item 1-2A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

  2. Employee health reporting

    Item 2-2A
    Person in charge was not aware of all reportable symptoms and illnesses.// Person in charge shall explain their responsibility for preventing the transmission of foodborne disease by a food employee who has a disease or medical condition that may cause foodborne disease and can describe the symptoms associated with the diseases that are transmissible through food. They also shall be able to explain how food employees and conditional employees comply with reporting responsibilities and exclusion or restriction of food employees. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Person in charge was educated on all reportable symptoms and illnesses.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(1)(c)2,3,17

    Person in charge was not aware of all reportable symptoms and illnesses.// Person in charge shall explain their responsibility for preventing the transmission of foodborne disease by a food employee who has a disease or medical condition that may cause foodborne disease and can describe the symptoms associated with the diseases that are transmissible through food. They also shall be able to explain how food employees and conditional employees comply with reporting responsibilities and exclusion or restriction of food employees. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Person in charge was educated on all reportable symptoms and illnesses.//
    Official report · Item 2-2A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

  3. Employee health reporting

    Item 2-2A
    Person in charge could not demonstrate in a verifiable manner that any employees have been informed of their responsibilities to report certain symptoms and illnesses.// Food employees and conditional employees shall be informed in a verifiable manner of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities as they relate to diseases that are transmissible through food. (Pf)
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(2)(o)

    Person in charge could not demonstrate in a verifiable manner that any employees have been informed of their responsibilities to report certain symptoms and illnesses.// Food employees and conditional employees shall be informed in a verifiable manner of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities as they relate to diseases that are transmissible through food. (Pf)
    Official report · Item 2-2A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

  4. Food labeling and containers

    Item 10D
    Facility does not have a written notification identifying which major allergens are used in the facility.// 1. If required by law, consumer warnings shall be provided. (C) 2. Food service establishment or manufacturers' dating information on foods may not be concealed or altered. (C) 3. The permit holder shall notify consumers by written notification of the presence of major food allergens as an ingredient in unpackaged food items that are served or sold to the consumer. (C)
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(7)(d)

    Facility does not have a written notification identifying which major allergens are used in the facility.// 1. If required by law, consumer warnings shall be provided. (C) 2. Food service establishment or manufacturers' dating information on foods may not be concealed or altered. (C) 3. The permit holder shall notify consumers by written notification of the presence of major food allergens as an ingredient in unpackaged food items that are served or sold to the consumer. (C)
    Official report · Item 10D ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

  5. Equipment design and condition

    Item 15A
    Observed ice accumulation coming from pipe connected to condenser in walk-in freezer. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION***.// Equipment shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under subsections .05(1) and .05(2) . (C)
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .05(6)(a)

    Observed ice accumulation coming from pipe connected to condenser in walk-in freezer. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION***.// Equipment shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under subsections .05(1) and .05(2) . (C)
    Official report · Item 15A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    87/100B
    Reading

Sources

01 / Primary source Official inspection & findings

Gwinnett County · Aug 31, 2026

02 / Same facility Official inspection history

Available records for this official facility

03 / How scoring works Georgia’s food-service rules
Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
D433FA11-3E41-4942-B3BC-22D3383DD0A8
Facility ID
D91379FB-6FBA-4E82-9801-B398C24A0889
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked