NickO Report

Metro Atlanta News

CitiesExplore

HANSEL AND GRETEL BAKERY CAFE receives A in Gwinnett County health inspection

Inspected

2131 Pleasant Hill Rd Suite 101 Duluth, GA 30096

Map ↗

HANSEL AND GRETEL BAKERY CAFE received an A, scoring 93 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Oct 21, 2026. The official report lists three findings. [1]

Inspection score

93/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed in-use dish machine at too low of a concentration of chlorine sanitizer. [2]

The inspector also observed multiple baked goods on display without any covering or wrapping. [3]

A separate finding described multiple employees making drinks without hair restraints. [4]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 3 of 3 findings

  1. Food-contact surface sanitation

    Item 4-2B
    Observed in-use dish machine at too low of a concentration of chlorine sanitizer. A chemical sanitizer used in a sanitizing solution for a manual or mechanical operations must meet a specified minimum concentration (for chlorine sanitizer it must be 50-100 ppm; for quat ammonia, it must be used according to the manufacturer's specifications). (P) Corrective Actions: Dish machine was primed to dispense at the proper concentration.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .05(6)(n)

    Observed in-use dish machine at too low of a concentration of chlorine sanitizer. A chemical sanitizer used in a sanitizing solution for a manual or mechanical operations must meet a specified minimum concentration (for chlorine sanitizer it must be 50-100 ppm; for quat ammonia, it must be used according to the manufacturer's specifications). (P) Corrective Actions: Dish machine was primed to dispense at the proper concentration.
    Official report · Item 4-2B ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Food storage and contamination

    Item 12A
    Observed multiple baked goods on display without any covering or wrapping. Except for nuts in the shell and whole, raw fruits and vegetables that are intended for hulling, peeling, or washing by the consumer before consumption, food on display shall be protected from contamination by the use of packaging, counter, service line, or salad bar food guards, display cases, or other effective means. (P) Corrective Actions: Baked goods were placed into bags to be placed on display.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(4)(u)

    Observed multiple baked goods on display without any covering or wrapping. Except for nuts in the shell and whole, raw fruits and vegetables that are intended for hulling, peeling, or washing by the consumer before consumption, food on display shall be protected from contamination by the use of packaging, counter, service line, or salad bar food guards, display cases, or other effective means. (P) Corrective Actions: Baked goods were placed into bags to be placed on display.
    Official report · Item 12A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  3. Personal cleanliness

    Item 12B
    Observed multiple employees making drinks without hair restraints. Employees preparing or handling food shall use effective and clean, disposable or easily cleanable nets or other hair restraints approved by the Health Authority, worn properly to restrain loose hair including beards and mustaches longer than one half inch (1/2"). (C) Corrective Actions: Employees restrained hair by tying back into tight ponytails.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(5)(j)

    Observed multiple employees making drinks without hair restraints. Employees preparing or handling food shall use effective and clean, disposable or easily cleanable nets or other hair restraints approved by the Health Authority, worn properly to restrain loose hair including beards and mustaches longer than one half inch (1/2"). (C) Corrective Actions: Employees restrained hair by tying back into tight ponytails.
    Official report · Item 12B ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    93/100A
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
ACF65A3C-03E1-4C6C-9F6B-58EF92E34CE4
Facility ID
A966C597-F9EB-4D19-B6C0-73B89F10C2CF
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked