NickO Report
CitiesExplore

SHAH'S HALAL FOOD scores 92; inspectors cite handwashing issues

Inspected

5450 Peachtree Pkwy Suite 8 B Norcross, GA 30092

Map ↗

SHAH'S HALAL FOOD received an A, scoring 92 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Jul 8, 2026. The official report lists three findings. [1]

Inspection score

92/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed an employee using hand sink to rinse sanitizer buckets and to rinse food containers. [2]

The inspector also observed multiple employees handling food with bracelets, watches, and rings on. [3]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 3 of 3 findings

  1. Handwashing

    Item 2-2D
    Observed employee using hand sink to rinse sanitizer buckets and to rinse food containers. A handwashing sink shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for employee use and not used for purposes other than handwashing. An automatic handwashing facility shall be used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Employee stopped using hand sink.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .06(2)(o)

    Observed employee using hand sink to rinse sanitizer buckets and to rinse food containers. A handwashing sink shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for employee use and not used for purposes other than handwashing. An automatic handwashing facility shall be used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Employee stopped using hand sink.
    Official report · Item 2-2D ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Personal cleanliness

    Item 12B
    Observed multiple employees handling food with bracelets, watches, and rings on. **SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION ON ROUTINE INSPECTION** Food employees may not wear jewelry including medical information jewelry on their arms and hands while preparing food (except for a plain ring such as a wedding band). (C) Corrective Actions: Employees removed jewelry.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(5)(h)

    Observed multiple employees handling food with bracelets, watches, and rings on. **SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION ON ROUTINE INSPECTION** Food employees may not wear jewelry including medical information jewelry on their arms and hands while preparing food (except for a plain ring such as a wedding band). (C) Corrective Actions: Employees removed jewelry.
    Official report · Item 12B ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  3. Personal cleanliness

    Item 12B
    Observed employee handling food without hair restraint. **SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION ON ROUTINE INSPECTION** Employees preparing or handling food shall use effective and clean, disposable or easily cleanable nets or other hair restraints approved by the Health Authority, worn properly to restrain loose hair including beards and mustaches longer than one half inch (1/2"). (C) Corrective Actions: Employee put on hat.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(5)(j)

    Observed employee handling food without hair restraint. **SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION ON ROUTINE INSPECTION** Employees preparing or handling food shall use effective and clean, disposable or easily cleanable nets or other hair restraints approved by the Health Authority, worn properly to restrain loose hair including beards and mustaches longer than one half inch (1/2"). (C) Corrective Actions: Employee put on hat.
    Official report · Item 12B ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    92/100A
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
95974DBF-D761-4140-8F67-A79A0B7380DE
Facility ID
F5A0D8DC-3E4B-4836-8601-A57B4982DCCE
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked