NickO Report
CitiesExplore

PANERA BREAD scores 96; inspectors cite personal cleanliness issues

Inspected

6575 Sugarloaf Pkwy Duluth, GA 30097

Map ↗

PANERA BREAD received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Sep 1, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]

Inspection score

96/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed two employees with beards longer than 1/2" that were not wearing beard restraints. [2]

The report states: “&(3)Observed unwrapped, single-use forks and spoons that were stored for customer use with the food/lip contact ends towards the customers rather than handles towards customers.” [3]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 2 of 2 findings

  1. Personal cleanliness

    Item 12B
    Observed two employees with beards longer than 1/2" that were not wearing beard restraints. Employees preparing or handling food shall use effective and clean, disposable or easily cleanable nets or other hair restraints approved by the Health Authority, worn properly to restrain loose hair including beards and mustaches longer than one half inch (1/2"). (C) Corrective Actions: Employees donned bearded nets.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(5)(j)

    Observed two employees with beards longer than 1/2" that were not wearing beard restraints. Employees preparing or handling food shall use effective and clean, disposable or easily cleanable nets or other hair restraints approved by the Health Authority, worn properly to restrain loose hair including beards and mustaches longer than one half inch (1/2"). (C) Corrective Actions: Employees donned bearded nets.
    Official report · Item 12B ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Single-use article storage and use

    Item 14C
    &(3)Observed unwrapped, single-use forks and spoons that were stored for customer use with the food/lip contact ends towards the customers rather than handles towards customers. Single-service and single-use articles and cleaned and sanitized utensils shall be handled, displayed, and dispensed so that contamination of food-and lip-contact surfaces is prevented. (C) Single-service articles that are intended for food- or lip-contact shall be furnished for consumer self-service with the original individual wrapper intact or from an approved dispenser. (C) Corrective Actions: Spoons and forks rearranged so that handles are encountered first when customers grab utensils.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .05(10)(g)(1)

    &(3)Observed unwrapped, single-use forks and spoons that were stored for customer use with the food/lip contact ends towards the customers rather than handles towards customers. Single-service and single-use articles and cleaned and sanitized utensils shall be handled, displayed, and dispensed so that contamination of food-and lip-contact surfaces is prevented. (C) Single-service articles that are intended for food- or lip-contact shall be furnished for consumer self-service with the original individual wrapper intact or from an approved dispenser. (C) Corrective Actions: Spoons and forks rearranged so that handles are encountered first when customers grab utensils.
    Official report · Item 14C ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    96/100A
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
6F36F58A-9C24-4A0B-9500-7A15CC0C5570
Facility ID
FD3B2E6A-7564-48F6-8D29-1F01B9C53766
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked