Inspection summary
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed facility using a vacuum sealed machine to seal broths on-site. [2]
Metro Atlanta News
OKIBORU RAMEN & TSUKEMEN received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Oct 29, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed facility using a vacuum sealed machine to seal broths on-site. [2]
Showing 1 of 1 findings
Observed facility using a vacuum sealed machine to seal broths on-site. There were a lot of broths in the freezer (at least 40 bags) that were made in excess of 48hrs. Except as specified under Rule .04(6)(l), a food service establishment that packages time/temperature control for safety food using a reduced oxygen packaging method shall implement a HACCP plan that contains the information specified under Rule .02(6)(b) and (d) and that meets all other requirements of subsection .04(6)(k)2. (P, Pf) Corrective Actions: PIC (person in charge) discarded all vacuum sealed food that was made more than 48hrs ago.
Code .04(6)(k)
Observed facility using a vacuum sealed machine to seal broths on-site. There were a lot of broths in the freezer (at least 40 bags) that were made in excess of 48hrs. Except as specified under Rule .04(6)(l), a food service establishment that packages time/temperature control for safety food using a reduced oxygen packaging method shall implement a HACCP plan that contains the information specified under Rule .02(6)(b) and (d) and that meets all other requirements of subsection .04(6)(k)2. (P, Pf) Corrective Actions: PIC (person in charge) discarded all vacuum sealed food that was made more than 48hrs ago.Official report · Item 9-2 ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Gwinnett County · Oct 29, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked