Inspection summary
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed multiple cooked food items stored in the reach-in cooler without proper date marking. [2]
One finding is marked as a repeat violation. [3]
Metro Atlanta News
Charminar Alpharetta received an A, scoring 94 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Nov 9, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed multiple cooked food items stored in the reach-in cooler without proper date marking. [2]
One finding is marked as a repeat violation. [3]
Showing 1 of 1 findings
Observed multiple cooked food items stored in the reach-in cooler without proper date marking. CA: EHS advised PIC to create labels for food items.
Code 511-6-1.04(6)(g)
Observed multiple cooked food items stored in the reach-in cooler without proper date marking. CA: EHS advised PIC to create labels for food items. 1. Except when packaging food using a reduced oxygen packaging method, and except as specified in paragraphs 5 and 6 of this subsection, refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded, when held at a temperature of 41°F (5°C) or below for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1. Pf Repeat Violation. Correct By: 11/09/2026Official report · Item 6-2 ↗
Correct by
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Fulton County · Nov 9, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked