NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Lucky Star Restaurant receives B in Fulton County health inspection

Inspected

1055 HOWELL MILL RD STE 110 ATLANTA, GA 30318

Map ↗

Lucky Star Restaurant received a B, scoring 86 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Jul 31, 2026. The official report lists six findings. [1]

Inspection score

86/100Grade BOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed no reminder statement on the menu for raw oysters. [2]

The inspector also observed no HAACP or variance for reduced oxygen packaged wagyu beef stored for up to 6 days. [3]

A separate finding described no documentation for a variance for reduced oxygen packaging used on beef. [4]

The report marks one finding as corrected on site. [5]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 6 of 6 findings

  1. Raw-food consumer advisory

    Item 5-2
    Observed no reminder statement on the menu for raw oysters. CA: Advised PIC that all raw or undercooked items served should be labelled with a reminder statement on the menu.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1-.04(7)(e)

    Observed no reminder statement on the menu for raw oysters. CA: Advised PIC that all raw or undercooked items served should be labelled with a reminder statement on the menu. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 5-2 ↗
    New violation
  2. Specialized process compliance

    Item 9-2
    Observed no HAACP or variance for reduced oxygen packaged wagyu beef stored for up to 6 days. CA: Advised PIC to obtain a variance from the Health Authority as specified in DPH Rule 511-6-1-.10(5)(a) and (5)(b) when performing the following: Pf 1.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.04(6)(j)

    Observed no HAACP or variance for reduced oxygen packaged wagyu beef stored for up to 6 days. CA: Advised PIC to obtain a variance from the Health Authority as specified in DPH Rule 511-6-1-.10(5)(a) and (5)(b) when performing the following: Pf 1. Smoking food as a method of food preservation rather than as a method of flavor enhancement; Pf 2. Curing food; Pf 3. Using food additives or adding components such as vinegar: Pf (i) As a method of food preservation rather than as a method of flavor enhancement, Pf or (ii) To render a food so that it is not time/temperature control for safety food; Pf 4. Operating a molluscan shellfish life-support system display tank used to store or display shellfish that are offered for human consumption; Pf 5. Packaging time/temperature control for safety food using a reduced oxygen packaging method except where the growth and toxin formation of Clostridium botulinum and growth of Listeria monocytogenes are controlled as specified under (k) of this Rule; Pf 6. Custom processing animals that are for personal use as food and not for sale or service in a food service establishment; Pf 7. Preparing food by another method that is determined by the Health Authority to require a variance; Pf or 8. Sprouting seeds or beans. Pf New Violation. Correct By: 08/11/2026
    Official report · Item 9-2 ↗
    New violation

    Correct by

  3. Specialized processing approval

    Item 10C
    Observed no documentation for a variance for reduced oxygen packaging used on beef. CA: Advised PIC to provide documentation of the proposed variance/HAACP plan as well as justifications to the Health Authority.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.05(b)

    Observed no documentation for a variance for reduced oxygen packaging used on beef. CA: Advised PIC to provide documentation of the proposed variance/HAACP plan as well as justifications to the Health Authority. New Violation. Correct By: 08/11/2026
    Official report · Item 10C ↗
    New violation

    Correct by

  4. Required permits and notices

    Item 13A
    Observed handwashing signage not posted at the sink used by bartenders and baristas to wash their hands. CA: Advised PIC to place hand wash signage at the sink used for handwashing.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.07(3)(d)

    Observed handwashing signage not posted at the sink used by bartenders and baristas to wash their hands. CA: Advised PIC to place hand wash signage at the sink used for handwashing. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 13A ↗
    New violation
  5. Utensil storage

    Item 14A
    Observed scoops in the main kitchen stored with the handles in garlic. Observed circular cups used as scoops stored in dry goods, including rice.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.04(4)(k)

    Observed scoops in the main kitchen stored with the handles in garlic. Observed circular cups used as scoops stored in dry goods, including rice. COS PIC removed the scoops. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 14A ↗
    Corrected on siteNew violation
  6. Warewashing facilities and test strips

    Item 15B
    Observed no chlorine test strips for the bar and main kitchen chlorine dishwashers. CA: Advised PIC to obtain test strips to accurately test the sanitizer efficacy.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.05(3)(h),(i),(j)

    Observed no chlorine test strips for the bar and main kitchen chlorine dishwashers. CA: Advised PIC to obtain test strips to accurately test the sanitizer efficacy. New Violation. Correct By: 08/11/2026
    Official report · Item 15B ↗
    New violation

    Correct by

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    86/100B
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Fulton County
Inspection ID
57544519
Facility ID
12996734
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked