NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Pisco Latin Kitchen receives A in Fulton County health inspection

Inspected

5975 ROSWELL RD STE E-353 ATLANTA, GA 30328

Map ↗

Pisco Latin Kitchen received an A, scoring 91 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Jul 7, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]

Inspection score

91/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed several TCS foods cold holding above 41F in prep top cooler. [2]

The inspector also observed white rice and yellow rice hot holding below 41F in steam table. [3]

The report marks one finding as corrected on site. [4]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 2 of 2 findings

  1. Cold holding

    Item 6-1A
    Observed several TCS foods cold holding above 41F in prep top cooler. CA: TCS Foods cold holding shall be maintained at 41F or below.
    Inspector’s full note
    Observed several TCS foods cold holding above 41F in prep top cooler. CA: TCS Foods cold holding shall be maintained at 41F or below. COS: Foods discarded. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 6-1A ↗
    New violation
  2. Hot holding temperatures

    Item 6-1B
    Observed white rice and yellow rice hot holding below 41F in steam table. CA: TCS foods hot holding shall be maintained at 135F or above.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.04(6)(f)

    Observed white rice and yellow rice hot holding below 41F in steam table. CA: TCS foods hot holding shall be maintained at 135F or above. COS: Foods reheated to 165F. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 6-1B ↗
    Corrected on siteNew violation

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    91/100A
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Fulton County
Inspection ID
57539148
Facility ID
12768493
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked