Inspection summary
The report states: “Mold was observed on the soda nozzles.” [2]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. One finding is marked as a repeat violation. [3]
MR COW received an A, scoring 94 out of 100, in a Cobb County food-service inspection on Aug 28, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]
The report states: “Mold was observed on the soda nozzles.” [2]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. One finding is marked as a repeat violation. [3]
Showing 2 of 2 findings
Mold was observed on the soda nozzles. CA: Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch.
Code 511-6-1.05(7)(a)1
Mold was observed on the soda nozzles. CA: Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. COS: The soda nozzles were cleaned and sanitized. Repeat Violation.Official report · Item 4-2B ↗
The sanitizer concentration at the 3-compartment sink was tested and measured at 0PPM. CA: Manual and Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Chemical Sanitization - Temperature, pH, Concentration, and Hardness.
Code 511-6-1.05(6)(n)
The sanitizer concentration at the 3-compartment sink was tested and measured at 0PPM. CA: Manual and Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Chemical Sanitization - Temperature, pH, Concentration, and Hardness. A chemical sanitizer used in a sanitizing solution for a manual or mechanical operation at contact times specified under subsection (8)(b)3 of this Rule shall meet the requirements specified in DPH Rule 511-6-1-.07(6)(g), shall be used in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered label use instructions. COS: The sanitizer at the 3-compartment sink measured 50PPM for chlorine. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.Official report · Item 4-2B ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Cobb County · Aug 28, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Cobb County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked