Metro Atlanta News
Sushi China Cafe received a B, scoring 80 out of 100, in a Clayton County food-service inspection on Oct 19, 2026. The official report lists four findings. [1]
The inspector observed no food allergen training for employees, upon request. [2]
The inspector also observed multiple employees wash hands at handsink under 20 seconds. [3]
A separate finding described bleach that is not appropriate for vomit/fecal response onsite at time of inspection per List G. [4]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. [5]
Showing 4 of 4 findings
Observed no food allergen training for employees, upon request. Employees are properly trained in food safety, including food allergy awareness, as it relates to their assigned duties.
Code 511-6-1.03(2)(a)-(n)(p),(q)
Observed no food allergen training for employees, upon request. Employees are properly trained in food safety, including food allergy awareness, as it relates to their assigned duties. Food allergy awareness includes describing foods identified as major food allergens and the symptoms that a major food allergen could cause in a sensitive individual who has an allergic reaction New Violation. Correct By: 10/29/2026Official report · Item 1-2A ↗
Correct by
Observed multiple employees wash hands at handsink under 20 seconds. Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms, including surrogate prosthetic devices for hands or arms, for at least 20 seconds, using a cleaning compound in a handwashing sink that is properly equipped.
Code 511-6-1.03(5)(b)
Observed multiple employees wash hands at handsink under 20 seconds. Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms, including surrogate prosthetic devices for hands or arms, for at least 20 seconds, using a cleaning compound in a handwashing sink that is properly equipped. COS: Had food employees rewash properly. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.Official report · Item 2-1B ↗
Observed bleach that is not appropriate for vomit/fecal response onsite at time of inspection per List G. A food establishment shall have written procedures for employees to follow and an EPA registered disinfectant effective against Norovirus available on-site at the food service establishment when responding to vomiting or diarrheal events that involve the discharge of vomitus or fecal matter onto surfaces in the food service establishment.
Code 511-6-1.03(6)
Observed bleach that is not appropriate for vomit/fecal response onsite at time of inspection per List G. A food establishment shall have written procedures for employees to follow and an EPA registered disinfectant effective against Norovirus available on-site at the food service establishment when responding to vomiting or diarrheal events that involve the discharge of vomitus or fecal matter onto surfaces in the food service establishment. The procedures shall address the specific actions employees must take to minimize the spread of contamination and the exposure of employees, consumers, food, and surfaces to vomitus or fecal matter. New Violation. Correct By: 10/29/2026Official report · Item 2-2E ↗
Correct by
Observed multiple wiping clothes on counter in multiple areas not stored properly in sanitization buckets. Cloths in-use for wiping counters and other equipment surfaces shall be: held between uses in a chemical sanitizer solution at a concentration specified under DPH Rule 511-6-1-.05(6)(n).
Code 511-6-1.04(4)(m)
Observed multiple wiping clothes on counter in multiple areas not stored properly in sanitization buckets. Cloths in-use for wiping counters and other equipment surfaces shall be: held between uses in a chemical sanitizer solution at a concentration specified under DPH Rule 511-6-1-.05(6)(n). New Violation. Correct By: 10/22/2026Official report · Item 12C ↗
Correct by
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Clayton County · Oct 19, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Clayton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked