Project history · Powder Springs · PZ26-020
Rezone
Follow the official record for case PZ26-020: filings, scheduled hearings, recorded actions and the reporting that connects them.
Dated records · Jul 27, 2026 – Aug 17, 2026
Official record ↗Case summary
This retained record is not automatically updated. Check the linked official sources and related reporting for later developments.
A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.
- Existing zoning in this record
- LISource · page 1 ↗
- Housing units listed
- 32Source · page 1 ↗
- Existing zoning in this record
- LISource · page 1 ↗
- What is proposed
- RezoneSource · page 1 ↗
- Site area (acres)
- 10.4Source · page 1 ↗
- Requested zoning
- PUD-RSource · page 1 ↗
- Housing units per acre
- 3.06Source · page 1 ↗
- Staff recommendation
- approval with conditionsSource ↗
- Area (square feet)
- 70,400Source · page 20 ↗
Some details have no verified date. Their source links remain available.
Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.
Zoning definitions
A verified definition for LI, PUD-R, Sec. 10-13 is unavailable for this jurisdiction and case date.
Case timeline
Oldest to newest, using dates in the official sources. Scheduled hearings do not establish that a hearing took place.
- on the agendaPZ26-020
Direct evidence link unavailable
- hearing scheduledPowder Springs Planning Commission meeting
Direct evidence link unavailable
- hearing scheduledscheduled
Direct evidence link unavailable
- filedOfficial filing record
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- hearing scheduledPowder Springs Planning Commission hearing
Exact evidence · page 1
public hearing on Monday, August 17th, 2026
Supporting records
These facts and documents have no separately verified date for the timeline. Dates mentioned in their text retain their original context.
- recommendation recordedRecommendation: approval with conditions
Exact evidence · page 20
Staff’s Recommendation is to approve the re-zoning of subject property from LI to PUD-R with conditions.
- recommendation recordedRecommendation: approval with conditions
Exact evidence · page 20
Staff’s Recommendation is to approve the re-zoning of subject property from LI to PUD-R with conditions.
- case referencedGrading Plan
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- case referencedAgenda
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- case referencedRevised Public Notice
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- case referencedGrading Plan
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- case referencedSite Plan
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- case referencedSite Plan
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- case referencedRevised Public Notice
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- case referencedSite Plan
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- case referencedAgenda
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- case referencedSite Plan
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Source factFrom Zoning: LI
Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Source factHousing Units: 32
Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Source factFrom Zoning: LI
Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Source factTo Land Use: Village Center Residential
Exact evidence · page 5 · Official record ↗
- Source factProposal Purpose: Rezone
Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Source factAcreage: 10.4
Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Source factTo Zoning: PUD-R
Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Source factOfficial Use Code: Sec. 10-13
Exact evidence · page 10 · Official record ↗
- Source factDensity Units Per Acre: 3.06
Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Source factNext Hearing Date: 2026-08-17
Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Source factStaff Recommendation: approval with conditions
Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Source factFrom Land Use: vacant industrial land
Exact evidence · page 18 · Official record ↗
- Source factMaterial Revision: Updated Site Plan (received 05/19/2026)
Exact evidence · page 7 · Official record ↗
- Source factSquare Feet: 70,400
Exact evidence · page 20 · Official record ↗
- Source factHearing Date: 2026-07-27
Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗
NickO Report archive
Reporting history
Newest published first. Each article reflects what was known at publication. Reports are linked by verified case identity or a source-cited reference to this case; an article may discuss more than one case.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs puts a zoning request on the agenda →
The retained Powder Springs agenda lists PZ26-020 for a zoning request.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs schedules a hearing for a zoning request →
The official record places PZ26-020 before Powder Springs for a zoning request.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs schedules a hearing for a planning case →
The official record places PZ26-020 before Powder Springs for a planning case.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs puts a planning case on the agenda →
The retained Powder Springs agenda lists PZ26-020 for a planning case.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs City staff recommends approval with conditions →
Powder Springs City staff records approval with conditions for PZ26-020.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs schedules a hearing for a planning recommendation case →
The official record places PZ26-020 before Powder Springs for a planning recommendation case.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs puts a planning recommendation case on the agenda →
The retained Powder Springs agenda lists PZ26-020 for a planning recommendation case.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs City staff recommends approval with conditions for a planning recommendation case →
Powder Springs City staff records approval with conditions for PZ26-020 for a planning recommendation case.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs: PZ26-020 — new filing for a planning recommendation case →
An official Powder Springs filing identifies PZ26-020 for a planning recommendation case.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs: PZ26-020 — Zoning designation: LI →
An accepted official fact records zoning designation as LI for PZ26-020.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs: PZ26-020 — Powder Springs City staff recommends approval with conditions →
Powder Springs City staff records approval with conditions for PZ26-020.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs: PZ26-020 recommendation: approval with conditions →
Powder Springs City staff records approval with conditions for PZ26-020.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs: PZ26-020 heads to a public hearing →
The official record places PZ26-020 before Powder Springs.
Published · Case reporting
Powder Springs: PZ26-020 enters the public record →
An official Powder Springs filing identifies PZ26-020.
Source coverage
This history grows as official records are verified and reporting is published. It may not include every filing or later action. An absent record does not mean an action never occurred.
Source follow-up: Scheduled.
Missing records
- Final decision — missing from our current sources
- Minutes — missing from our current sources
Case coverage
Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.
- Filing / applicationCoveredExact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
- Agenda / hearingCoveredAn accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
- Packet + attachmentsCoveredExact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
- Minutes + voteSource gapThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
- Recommendation / decisionCoveredAn accepted official recommendation fact is linked to this case.
- Follow-up changeSource gapThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →