NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Mesun Health & Rehabilitation Center receives B in Gwinnett County health inspection

Inspected

88 Johnson Rd Building 2 Lawrenceville, GA 30046

Map ↗

Mesun Health & Rehabilitation Center received a B, scoring 86 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Oct 1, 2026. The official report lists three findings. [1]

Inspection score

86/100Grade BOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed kimbap (cooked beef with steamed vegetables) sitting on the prep table with the intention to be kept at room temperature. [2]

The inspector also observed steamed broccoli, boiled napa cabbage, two containers of rice, one container of cooked chicken, and miso soup with cut cabbage that did not cool at a fast enough rate. [3]

The report states: “Facility using improper methods for cooling for time/temperature control foods.” [4]

6 points higher than the previous inspection in our records: 80/100 on Jun 15, 2026. Intervening inspections may be missing.

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 3 of 3 findings

  1. Cold holding

    Item 6-1A
    Observed kimbap (cooked beef with steamed vegetables) sitting on the prep table with the intention to be kept at room temperature. Per person in charge (PIC), the kimbap had been sitting out at room temperature for less than 4 hours. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION OF THE SAME CODE PROVISION*** Time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 41°F (5°C) or below. (P) Corrective Actions: The kimbap was placed on time control.//
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(6)(f)

    Observed kimbap (cooked beef with steamed vegetables) sitting on the prep table with the intention to be kept at room temperature. Per person in charge (PIC), the kimbap had been sitting out at room temperature for less than 4 hours. ***SECOND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION OF THE SAME CODE PROVISION*** Time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 41°F (5°C) or below. (P) Corrective Actions: The kimbap was placed on time control.//
    Official report · Item 6-1A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Cooling time and temperature

    Item 6-1C
    Observed steamed broccoli, boiled napa cabbage, two containers of rice, one container of cooked chicken, and miso soup with cut cabbage that did not cool at a fast enough rate. (See temperature log).// Cooked time/temperature control for safety food shall be cooled: 1) within 2 hours from 135°F (57°C) to 70°F (21°C); and 2) within a total of 6 hours from 135°F (57°C) to 41°F (5°C) or below. (P) Corrective Actions: The two containers of rice and one container of cooked chicken was discarded. The person in charge (PIC) placed the steamed broccoli, miso soup, and boiled napa cabbage in an ice bath after the first temperature. After the second temperature, the items were placed in the walk in…
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(6)(d)

    Observed steamed broccoli, boiled napa cabbage, two containers of rice, one container of cooked chicken, and miso soup with cut cabbage that did not cool at a fast enough rate. (See temperature log).// Cooked time/temperature control for safety food shall be cooled: 1) within 2 hours from 135°F (57°C) to 70°F (21°C); and 2) within a total of 6 hours from 135°F (57°C) to 41°F (5°C) or below. (P) Corrective Actions: The two containers of rice and one container of cooked chicken was discarded. The person in charge (PIC) placed the steamed broccoli, miso soup, and boiled napa cabbage in an ice bath after the first temperature. After the second temperature, the items were placed in the walk in freezer. //
    Official report · Item 6-1C ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  3. Cooling methods and equipment

    Item 11A
    Facility using improper methods for cooling for time/temperature control foods. Foods were cooling in plastic containers filled to the top in the walk in cooler. After the initial cooling temperature, the foods were cooling in an improper ice bath (the ice did not cover all portions of the container).// Foods shall be cooled using one or more methods approved by the health authority (e.g., smaller batches, thinner portions, using rapid cooling equipment, stirring food in containers placed in an ice water bath, using containers that facilitate heat transfer and ice as an ingredient; placing items in the walk-in cooler or walk-in freezer partially or completely uncovered as long as the food…
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(6)(e)

    Facility using improper methods for cooling for time/temperature control foods. Foods were cooling in plastic containers filled to the top in the walk in cooler. After the initial cooling temperature, the foods were cooling in an improper ice bath (the ice did not cover all portions of the container).// Foods shall be cooled using one or more methods approved by the health authority (e.g., smaller batches, thinner portions, using rapid cooling equipment, stirring food in containers placed in an ice water bath, using containers that facilitate heat transfer and ice as an ingredient; placing items in the walk-in cooler or walk-in freezer partially or completely uncovered as long as the food is protected from overhead contamination). (Pf, C) Corrective Actions: Discussed cooling foods in shallow pans, cooling foods with the lid uncovered where no cross contamination can occur or items can be placed in the walk in freezer.//
    Official report · Item 11A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 2

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    86/100B
    Reading
  2. Earlier record
    80/100B
    Report

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
C1A5AB3B-28E8-4040-BC90-BC194B3DEC46
Facility ID
B2AC7E31-33EF-4B4F-AA71-5FF0516A0D6A
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked