NICKO REPORT
CitiesExplore

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL receives A in Gwinnett County health inspection

Inspected

862 Harbins Rd Dacula, GA 30019

Map ↗

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Sep 22, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]

Inspection score

96/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The report states: “Person in charge was not aware of the symptoms or diseases that need to be reported to the health department.” [2]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 2 of 2 findings

  1. Employee health reporting

    Item 2-2A
    Person in charge was not aware of the symptoms or diseases that need to be reported to the health department. The permit holder shall require food employees to report to the Certified Food Safety Manager (CFSM) and Person-In-Charge information about their health, activities, and any other relevant information (i.e., onset of symptoms and illness or diagnosis without symptoms) as they relate to diseases that are spread through food. (P, Pf) Corrective Actions: Advised person in charge of reporting Jaundice and all 6 diseases to the health department.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(4)(a)(b)(c)(e)(f)

    Person in charge was not aware of the symptoms or diseases that need to be reported to the health department. The permit holder shall require food employees to report to the Certified Food Safety Manager (CFSM) and Person-In-Charge information about their health, activities, and any other relevant information (i.e., onset of symptoms and illness or diagnosis without symptoms) as they relate to diseases that are spread through food. (P, Pf) Corrective Actions: Advised person in charge of reporting Jaundice and all 6 diseases to the health department.
    Official report · Item 2-2A
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Employee health reporting

    Item 2-2A
    Person in charge didn't know all of the symptoms and diseases that have to be reported to her. Person in charge shall explain their responsibility for preventing the transmission of foodborne disease by a food employee who has a disease or medical condition that may cause foodborne disease and can describe the symptoms associated with the diseases that are transmissible through food. They also shall be able to explain how food employees and conditional employees comply with reporting responsibilities and exclusion or restriction of food employees. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Advised person in charge of the symptoms and disease that need to be reported to the person in charge.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(1)(c)2,3,17

    Person in charge didn't know all of the symptoms and diseases that have to be reported to her. Person in charge shall explain their responsibility for preventing the transmission of foodborne disease by a food employee who has a disease or medical condition that may cause foodborne disease and can describe the symptoms associated with the diseases that are transmissible through food. They also shall be able to explain how food employees and conditional employees comply with reporting responsibilities and exclusion or restriction of food employees. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Advised person in charge of the symptoms and disease that need to be reported to the person in charge.
    Official report · Item 2-2A
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    96/100A
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
3EC7BB6E-2C95-40F1-80FE-F2A6E6A57FC4
Facility ID
D0103A5C-FD8E-427A-88DF-472C530FD335
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked