Inspection summary
The inspector observed food employee wrapping a metal pan of raw chicken on top of the trash can. [2]
The inspector also observed food debris present along the bottom 2 reach in coolers in the main kitchen. [3]
CHAI PEKING received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a DeKalb County food-service inspection on Aug 19, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]
The inspector observed food employee wrapping a metal pan of raw chicken on top of the trash can. [2]
The inspector also observed food debris present along the bottom 2 reach in coolers in the main kitchen. [3]
Showing 2 of 2 findings
Observed food employee wrapping a metal pan of raw chicken on top of the trash can. CA: Advised PIC Food shall be protected from contamination that may result from a factor or source not specified under paragraphs (a) through (y) of this subsection.
Code 511-6-1.04(4)(z)
Observed food employee wrapping a metal pan of raw chicken on top of the trash can. CA: Advised PIC Food shall be protected from contamination that may result from a factor or source not specified under paragraphs (a) through (y) of this subsection. New Violation.Official report · Item 12A ↗
Observed food debris present along the bottom 2 reach in coolers in the main kitchen. CA: Advised PIC Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues.
Code 511-6-1.05(7)(d)
Observed food debris present along the bottom 2 reach in coolers in the main kitchen. CA: Advised PIC Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. New Violation.Official report · Item 15C ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
DeKalb County · Aug 19, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyInspection 57547767 · Facility 12978348
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from DeKalb County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked