Inspection summary
The report states: “Facility did not have written procedures for employees to follow for vomit/fecal.” [2]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. [3]
GREEN LOTUS received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a Cobb County food-service inspection on Aug 27, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]
The report states: “Facility did not have written procedures for employees to follow for vomit/fecal.” [2]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. [3]
Showing 1 of 1 findings
Facility did not have written procedures for employees to follow for vomit/fecal. C/A: A food establishment shall have written procedures for employees to follow and an EPA registered disinfectant effective against Norovirus available on-site at the food service establishment when responding to vomiting or diarrheal events that involve the discharge of vomitus or fecal matter onto surfaces in the food service establishment.
Code 511-6-1.03(6)
Facility did not have written procedures for employees to follow for vomit/fecal. C/A: A food establishment shall have written procedures for employees to follow and an EPA registered disinfectant effective against Norovirus available on-site at the food service establishment when responding to vomiting or diarrheal events that involve the discharge of vomitus or fecal matter onto surfaces in the food service establishment. The procedures shall address the specific actions employees must take to minimize the spread of contamination and the exposure of employees, consumers, food, and surfaces to vomitus or fecal matter COS:EHS provided facility with procedure Corrected On-Site. New Violation.Official report · Item 2-2E ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Cobb County · Aug 27, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Cobb County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked