STARBUCKS #699 - INSIDE KROGER received an A, scoring 91 out of 100, in a Cobb County food-service inspection on Aug 13, 2026. The official report lists three findings. [1]
The report states: “There was not a designated person in charge for the facility.” [2]
The inspector also observed black and pink buildup on food contact surface of ice machine baffle in storage room and filtered water dispenser in front food service. [3]
A separate finding described no quat sanitizer test strips to measure concentration of sanitizer. [4]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. [5]
Showing 3 of 3 findings
There was not a designated person in charge for the facility. C/A: There must be a person in charge on the premises of the food service establishment at all times.
Code 511-6-1.03(2)
There was not a designated person in charge for the facility. C/A: There must be a person in charge on the premises of the food service establishment at all times. COS: Food employee was designated as PIC during inspection. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.Official report · Item 1-2A ↗
Observed black and pink buildup on food contact surface of ice machine baffle in storage room and filtered water dispenser in front food service. C/A: Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch.
Code 511-6-1.05(7)(a)1
Observed black and pink buildup on food contact surface of ice machine baffle in storage room and filtered water dispenser in front food service. C/A: Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. New Violation. Correct By: 08/23/2026Official report · Item 4-2B ↗
Correct by
Observed no quat sanitizer test strips to measure concentration of sanitizer. C/A: A test kit or other device that accurately measures the concentration in mg/L of sanitizing solutions shall be provided.
Code 511-6-1.05(3)(h),(i),(j)
Observed no quat sanitizer test strips to measure concentration of sanitizer. C/A: A test kit or other device that accurately measures the concentration in mg/L of sanitizing solutions shall be provided. New Violation. Correct By: 08/23/2026Official report · Item 15B ↗
Correct by
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Cobb County · Aug 13, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Cobb County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked