Inspection summary
The inspector observed no food allergen awareness for the public. [2]
The inspector also observed multiple metal containers with food stains on the exterior of bins in need of cleaning. [3]
LEWIS LITTLE THIS LITTLE THAT received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a Clayton County food-service inspection on Oct 8, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]
The inspector observed no food allergen awareness for the public. [2]
The inspector also observed multiple metal containers with food stains on the exterior of bins in need of cleaning. [3]
Showing 2 of 2 findings
Observed no food allergen awareness for the public. The permit holder shall notify consumers by written notification of the presence of major food allergens as an ingredient in unpackaged food items that are served or sold to the consumer.
Code 511-6-1.04(7)(d)
Observed no food allergen awareness for the public. The permit holder shall notify consumers by written notification of the presence of major food allergens as an ingredient in unpackaged food items that are served or sold to the consumer. New Violation. Correct By: 10/11/2026Official report · Item 10D ↗
Correct by
Observed multiple metal containers with food stains on the exterior of bins in need of cleaning. Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris.
Code 511-6-1.05(7)(a)2,3
Observed multiple metal containers with food stains on the exterior of bins in need of cleaning. Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris. New Violation. Correct By: 10/11/2026Official report · Item 15C ↗
Correct by
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Clayton County · Oct 8, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Clayton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked