Sandy Springs · case RZ22-0003
Residential Townhouse
Source GapLatest reporting · Published Aug 3, 2026
Sandy Springs filing centers on residential Townhouse →
The accepted official record for RZ22-0003 lists proposal purpose as Residential Townhouse.
Case summary
A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.
- What is proposed
- Residential TownhouseSource date unavailable · Source · page 6 ↗
- Recorded outcome
- approvedSource date unavailable · Source · page 3 ↗
- Planning recommendation
- approvalSource date unavailable · Source · page 3 ↗
- Existing zoning in this record
- RD-18Source date unavailable · Source · page 1 ↗
- Site area (acres)
- 1.15Source date unavailable · Source · page 7 ↗
- Housing units listed
- 2Source date unavailable · Source · page 10 ↗
- Staff recommendation
- approvalSource date unavailable · Source · page 5 ↗
- Requested zoning
- RT-3Source date unavailable · Source · page 5 ↗
Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.
Zoning definitions
- RD-18 · RD-18
- RD-18 18,000 sf* 100 30 50 20 10 35 3/40*Official code citation ↗
Case timeline
- Official filing recordfiled
Lifecycle Event · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Agendacase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Agendacase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Minutescase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Agendacase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Minutescase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Minutescase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Official Use Code: RZ22-0003Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗
- Proposal Purpose: Residential TownhouseSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 6 · Official record ↗
- Final Outcome: approvedSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 3 · Official record ↗
- Planning Recommendation: approvalSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 3 · Official record ↗
- From Zoning: RD-18Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Acreage: 1.15Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 7 · Official record ↗
- Housing Units: 2Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 10 · Official record ↗
- Staff Recommendation: approvalSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 5 · Official record ↗
- To Zoning: RT-3Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 5 · Official record ↗
- Material Revision: 2022-05-10 Application RevisionSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 7 · Official record ↗
- From Land Use: Single Unit Detached ResidentialSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 7 · Official record ↗
- Building Count: 2Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 10 · Official record ↗
- Hearing Date: 2022-07-20Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
Missing records
- Agenda — missing from our current sources
- Final decision — missing from our current sources
- Hearing — missing from our current sources
- Minutes — missing from our current sources
- Recommendation — missing from our current sources
Case coverage
Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.
- Filing / applicationCoveredExact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
- Agenda / hearingCoveredAn accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
- Packet + attachmentsSource gapThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
- Minutes + voteSource gapThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
- Recommendation / decisionCoveredAn accepted official outcome fact is linked to this case.
- Follow-up changeSource gapThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →