Sandy Springs · case RZ21-0003

redeveloped retail

Source Gap

Official record ↗

Latest reporting · Published Aug 3, 2026

Sandy Springs filing centers on redeveloped retail →

The accepted official record for RZ21-0003 lists proposal purpose as redeveloped retail.

Case summary

A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.

Recorded outcome: PassedSource date unavailable · Source · page 2 ↗
Staff recommendation: approveSource date unavailable · Source · page 6 ↗
Area (square feet): 51,400Source date unavailable · Source · page 4 ↗
What is proposed: redeveloped retailSource date unavailable · Source · page 4 ↗
Requested zoning: CS-6 (City Springs, 6 Stories Maximum Height)Source date unavailable · Source · page 6 ↗
Housing units listed: 23Source date unavailable · Source · page 4 ↗
Existing zoning in this record: CS-3 (City Springs, 3 Stories Maximum Height)Source date unavailable · Source · page 6 ↗
Site area (acres): 7.95Source date unavailable · Source · page 6 ↗
Planning recommendation: approveSource date unavailable · Source · page 6 ↗

Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.

Zoning definitions

A verified definition for CS-6 (City Springs, 6 Stories Maximum Height), RZ21-0003, CS-3 (City Springs, 3 Stories Maximum Height) is unavailable for this jurisdiction and case date.

Case timeline

Jul 27, 2026Official filing recordfiled
Lifecycle Event · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableAgendacase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableAgendacase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableMinutescase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableMinutescase referenced
Document · Exact evidence · page 6 · Official record ↗
requested change
Source date unavailableAgendacase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableMinutescase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableFinal Outcome: PassedSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableFrom Land Use: Movie Theater, Retail, RestaurantsSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableVote No: 1Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableStaff Recommendation: approveSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 6 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableSquare Feet: 51,400Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableProposal Purpose: redeveloped retailSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableHearing Date: 2021-12-21Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 6 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableVote Yes: 4Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableTo Zoning: CS-6 (City Springs, 6 Stories Maximum Height)Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 6 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableHousing Units: 23Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableOfficial Use Code: RZ21-0003Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableFrom Zoning: CS-3 (City Springs, 3 Stories Maximum Height)Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 6 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableMaterial Revision: YesSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableVote Abstain: 0Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailableAcreage: 7.95Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 6 · Official record ↗
Source date unavailablePlanning Recommendation: approveSource fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 6 · Official record ↗

Missing records

Agenda — missing from our current sources
Final decision — missing from our current sources
Hearing — missing from our current sources
Minutes — missing from our current sources
Recommendation — missing from our current sources

Case coverage

Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.

Filing / applicationCovered
Exact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
Agenda / hearingCovered
An accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
Packet + attachmentsSource gap
The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Minutes + voteCovered
An accepted official vote fact is linked to this case.
Recommendation / decisionCovered
An accepted official outcome fact is linked to this case.
Follow-up changeSource gap
The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.

Document coverage details

Packet incompleteNo packet or attachment evidence links are available.The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.

Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →