Sandy Springs · case RZ-25-6
Case RZ-25-6
Source GapLatest reporting · Published Aug 3, 2026
Sandy Springs filing lists an RE-1-to-RD-9 rezoning case →
Official case RZ-25-6 includes a hearing date of April 22, 2026.
Case summary
A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.
- Requested zoning
- RD-9Source date unavailable · Source · page 1 ↗
- Staff recommendation
- Rezone the Properties at 1265, 1309, 1329, 1349 & 1369 Spalding Drive from RE-1 to RD-9Source date unavailable · Source · page 2 ↗
- Existing zoning in this record
- RE-1Source date unavailable · Source · page 1 ↗
Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.
Zoning definitions
- RD-9 · RD-9
- RD-9 9,000 sf* 70* 40 35 20 7 25 3/40*Official code citation ↗
- RE-1 · RE-1
- RE-1 1 ac* 150* 20 60 30 15 40 3/40*Official code citation ↗
Case timeline
- Official filing recordfiled
Lifecycle Event · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Agendacase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Agendacase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Minutescase referenced
Document · Official evidence linked · Official record ↗
- Official Use Code: RZ-25-6Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗
- To Zoning: RD-9Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Hearing Date: 2026-04-22Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
- Staff Recommendation: Rezone the Properties at 1265, 1309, 1329, 1349 & 1369 Spalding Drive from RE-1 to RD-9Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗
- From Zoning: RE-1Source fact
Fact · Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗
Missing records
- Agenda — missing from our current sources
- Final decision — missing from our current sources
- Hearing — missing from our current sources
- Minutes — missing from our current sources
- Recommendation — missing from our current sources
Case coverage
Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.
- Filing / applicationCoveredExact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
- Agenda / hearingCoveredAn accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
- Packet + attachmentsSource gapThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
- Minutes + voteSource gapThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
- Recommendation / decisionCoveredAn accepted official recommendation fact is linked to this case.
- Follow-up changeSource gapThe launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →