Inspection summary
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed moderate dust/debris underneath metal racks near the dishwasher. [2]
The inspector also observed heavy dust/debris on vents in the warewashing area. [3]
TACOCAT / PHORAMEN'L receives A in Richmond County health inspection
TACOCAT / PHORAMEN'L received an A, scoring 98 out of 100, in a Richmond County food-service inspection on Nov 10, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]
Inspection score
98/100Grade AOfficial inspectionWhat inspectors found
Showing 2 of 2 findings
Equipment cleanliness
Item 15CObserved moderate dust/debris underneath metal racks near the dishwasher. C/A: Clean.
Inspector’s full note
Code 511-6-1.05(7)(a)2,3
Observed moderate dust/debris underneath metal racks near the dishwasher. C/A: Clean. Increase cleaning frequency. New Violation.
Official report · Item 15C ↗New violationFacility maintenance and cleanliness
Item 17CObserved heavy dust/debris on vents in the warewashing area. C/A: Clean.
Inspector’s full note
Code 511-6-1.07(5)(a),(b)
Observed heavy dust/debris on vents in the warewashing area. C/A: Clean. Increase cleaning frequency. New Violation.
Official report · Item 17C ↗New violation
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Inspection history 1
Official history ↗- This report98/100AReading
Sources
01 / Primary source ↗Official inspection & findings
Richmond County · Nov 10, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesRecord details & methodology
- Authority
- Richmond County
- Inspection ID
- 57562419
- Facility ID
- 12974399
- Record captured
- Venue address source
- Official listing ·
Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Richmond County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Georgia’s grading scale
- A
- 90–100
- B
- 80–89
- C
- 70–79
- U
- 0–69
Checked