Metro Atlanta News

CitiesExplore

DIPPIN' DOTS receives A in Richmond County health inspection

Inspected

3328 WASHINGTON RD AUGUSTA, GA 30907

Map ↗

DIPPIN' DOTS received an A, scoring 90 out of 100, in a Richmond County food-service inspection on Oct 27, 2026. The official report lists six findings. [1]

Inspection score

90/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

Inspection purpose: Routine

The inspector observed no Certified Food Protection Manager certification. [2]

The inspector also observed no employee health reporting agreements. [3]

A separate finding described no written procedures for responding to vomiting and diarrheal events. [4]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 6 of 6 findings

  1. Food protection manager

    Item 1-2B
    Observed no Certified Food Protection Manager certification. C/A: Obtain certification within 60 days.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.03(3)(a)

    Observed no Certified Food Protection Manager certification. C/A: Obtain certification within 60 days. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 1-2B ↗
    New violation
  2. Employee health reporting

    Item 2-2A
    Observed no employee health reporting agreements. C/A: Ensure each employee agrees to and signs an employee health reporting agreement.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.03(4)(a)(b)(c)(e)(f)

    Observed no employee health reporting agreements. C/A: Ensure each employee agrees to and signs an employee health reporting agreement. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 2-2A ↗
    New violation
  3. Vomiting and diarrheal response procedures

    Item 2-2E
    Observed no written procedures for responding to vomiting and diarrheal events. C/A: Develop written procedures for responding to vomiting and diarrheal events.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.03(6)

    Observed no written procedures for responding to vomiting and diarrheal events. C/A: Develop written procedures for responding to vomiting and diarrheal events. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 2-2E ↗
    New violation
  4. Warewashing facilities and test strips

    Item 15B
    Observed no test strips for the sanitizer being used. C/A: Obtain the proper test strips for the sanitizer being used.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.05(3)(h),(i),(j)

    Observed no test strips for the sanitizer being used. C/A: Obtain the proper test strips for the sanitizer being used. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 15B ↗
    New violation
  5. Facility maintenance and cleanliness

    Item 17C
    Observed the mop sitting on the floor in the back storage area. C/A: Hang mop to air dry in between uses.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.07(5)(f)

    Observed the mop sitting on the floor in the back storage area. C/A: Hang mop to air dry in between uses. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 17C ↗
    New violation
  6. Facility maintenance and cleanliness

    Item 17C
    Observed several missing/damaged ceiling times in the back storage area. C/A: Replace all missing/damaged ceiling tiles.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.07(2)(f),(g)

    Observed several missing/damaged ceiling times in the back storage area. C/A: Replace all missing/damaged ceiling tiles. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 17C ↗
    New violation

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    90/100A
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Richmond County
Inspection ID
57559466
Facility ID
12984476
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Richmond County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked