Inspection summary
Inspection purpose: Routine
The report states: “Not all of the major food allergens located within facility listed on allergen disclosure.” [2]
Metro Atlanta News
AKARI SUSHI AND RAMEN received an A, scoring 97 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Nov 13, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]
Inspection purpose: Routine
The report states: “Not all of the major food allergens located within facility listed on allergen disclosure.” [2]
Showing 1 of 1 findings
Not all of the major food allergens located within facility listed on allergen disclosure. Not all fish species are noted, along with wheat or soy. 1. If required by law, consumer warnings shall be provided. (C) 2. Food service establishment or manufacturers' dating information on foods may not be concealed or altered. (C) 3. The permit holder shall notify consumers by written notification of the presence of major food allergens as an ingredient in unpackaged food items that are served or sold to the consumer. (C)
Code .04(7)(d)
Not all of the major food allergens located within facility listed on allergen disclosure. Not all fish species are noted, along with wheat or soy. 1. If required by law, consumer warnings shall be provided. (C) 2. Food service establishment or manufacturers' dating information on foods may not be concealed or altered. (C) 3. The permit holder shall notify consumers by written notification of the presence of major food allergens as an ingredient in unpackaged food items that are served or sold to the consumer. (C)Official report · Item 10D ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Gwinnett County · Nov 13, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked