Metro Atlanta News

CitiesExplore

SUGARPHIN receives B in Gwinnett County health inspection

Inspected

3350 Steve Reynolds Blvd Suite 101 & 102 Duluth, GA 30096

Map ↗

SUGARPHIN received a B, scoring 88 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Oct 27, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]

Inspection score

88/100Grade BOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

Inspection purpose: Routine

The inspector observed three containers of cooked mungbean that did not reach 41F after cooling overnight. [2]

The inspector also observed three containers of cooked mungebean that were cooled in a way that did not allow for proper cooling, two were large batches in upright cooler, covered, and all were stored at the bottom of the upright cooler. [3]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 2 of 2 findings

  1. Cooling time and temperature

    Item 6-1C
    Observed three containers of cooked mungbean that did not reach 41F after cooling overnight. (see temp log) Time/temperature control for safety food shall be cooled within 4 hours to 41°F (5°C) or less if prepared from ingredients at ambient temperature, such as reconstituted foods and canned tuna. (P) Corrective Actions: Food items were discarded.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(6)(d)

    Observed three containers of cooked mungbean that did not reach 41F after cooling overnight. (see temp log) Time/temperature control for safety food shall be cooled within 4 hours to 41°F (5°C) or less if prepared from ingredients at ambient temperature, such as reconstituted foods and canned tuna. (P) Corrective Actions: Food items were discarded.
    Official report · Item 6-1C ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Cooling methods and equipment

    Item 11A
    Observed three containers of cooked mungebean that were cooled in a way that did not allow for proper cooling, two were large batches in upright cooler, covered, and all were stored at the bottom of the upright cooler. Foods shall be cooled using one or more methods approved by the health authority (e.g., smaller batches, thinner portions, using rapid cooling equipment, stirring food in containers placed in an ice water bath, using containers that facilitate heat transfer and ice as an ingredient; placing items in the walk-in cooler or walk-in freezer partially or completely uncovered as long as the food is protected from overhead contamination). (Pf, C) Corrective Actions: Food was…
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(6)(e)

    Observed three containers of cooked mungebean that were cooled in a way that did not allow for proper cooling, two were large batches in upright cooler, covered, and all were stored at the bottom of the upright cooler. Foods shall be cooled using one or more methods approved by the health authority (e.g., smaller batches, thinner portions, using rapid cooling equipment, stirring food in containers placed in an ice water bath, using containers that facilitate heat transfer and ice as an ingredient; placing items in the walk-in cooler or walk-in freezer partially or completely uncovered as long as the food is protected from overhead contamination). (Pf, C) Corrective Actions: Food was discarded and better cooling methods discussed with PIC.
    Official report · Item 11A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    88/100B
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
AB443FAD-C897-4E10-A446-54959643D279
Facility ID
BD6C5654-5FAB-444D-8735-A3F129A32556
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked