Inspection summary
The inspector observed PIC (Person in Charge) unable to demonstrate in a verifiable manner that food employees are aware of their reporting responsibilities. [2]
POLLO CAMPERO LAWRENCEVILLE received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Jul 24, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]
The inspector observed PIC (Person in Charge) unable to demonstrate in a verifiable manner that food employees are aware of their reporting responsibilities. [2]
Showing 1 of 1 findings
Observed PIC (Person in Charge) unable to demonstrate in a verifiable manner that food employees are aware of their reporting responsibilities. Food employees and conditional employees shall be informed in a verifiable manner of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities as they relate to diseases that are transmissible through food. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Employees read and signed employee health reporting agreement form.
Code .03(2)(o)
Observed PIC (Person in Charge) unable to demonstrate in a verifiable manner that food employees are aware of their reporting responsibilities. Food employees and conditional employees shall be informed in a verifiable manner of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities as they relate to diseases that are transmissible through food. (Pf) Corrective Actions: Employees read and signed employee health reporting agreement form.Official report · Item 2-2A ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Gwinnett County · Jul 24, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked