Metro Atlanta News
PHO 24 received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Nov 3, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed chlorine sanitizer in a spray bottle, used to clean tables, at a concentration above 100ppm. [2]
6 points higher than the previous inspection in our records: 90/100 on Sep 8, 2026. Intervening inspections may be missing.
Showing 1 of 1 findings
Observed chlorine sanitizer in a spray bottle, used to clean tables, at a concentration above 100ppm. Chemical sanitizers, including chemical sanitizing solutions generated on-site, and other chemical antimicrobials used on food contact surfaces shall not exceed stated concentrations as listed on the EPA-registered label, in 40 CFR 180.940 and 40 CFR 180.2020, (100 ppm for chlorine and 400 ppm for quaternary ammonia). (P) Corrective Actions: The sanitizer was remade to be an appropriate concentration for chlorine.
Code .07(6)(g)
Observed chlorine sanitizer in a spray bottle, used to clean tables, at a concentration above 100ppm. Chemical sanitizers, including chemical sanitizing solutions generated on-site, and other chemical antimicrobials used on food contact surfaces shall not exceed stated concentrations as listed on the EPA-registered label, in 40 CFR 180.940 and 40 CFR 180.2020, (100 ppm for chlorine and 400 ppm for quaternary ammonia). (P) Corrective Actions: The sanitizer was remade to be an appropriate concentration for chlorine.Official report · Item 8-2B ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Gwinnett County · Nov 3, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked
