SUMO HIBACHI AND WINGS received an A, scoring 90 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Jul 22, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]
The inspector observed several time/temperature control for safety foods cold holding above 41F in prep cooler (see temperature log).// Time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 41°F (5°C) or below. [2]
The inspector also observed prep cooler unable to maintain proper cold holding temperatures. [3]
Showing 2 of 2 findings
Observed several time/temperature control for safety foods cold holding above 41F in prep cooler (see temperature log).// Time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 41°F (5°C) or below. (P) Corrective Actions: Foods were discarded.//
Code .04(6)(f)
Observed several time/temperature control for safety foods cold holding above 41F in prep cooler (see temperature log).// Time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 41°F (5°C) or below. (P) Corrective Actions: Foods were discarded.//Official report · Item 6-1A ↗
Observed prep cooler unable to maintain proper cold holding temperatures. Minimum ambient temperature was 54.7F.// Equipment shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under subsections .05(1) and .05(2) . (C)
Code .05(6)(a)
Observed prep cooler unable to maintain proper cold holding temperatures. Minimum ambient temperature was 54.7F.// Equipment shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under subsections .05(1) and .05(2) . (C)Official report · Item 15A ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Gwinnett County · Jul 22, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked