NickO Report
CitiesExplore

LA MEJOR DE MICHOACAN receives A in Gwinnett County health inspection

Inspected

5824 Singleton Rd Suite 104 Norcross, GA 30093

Map ↗

LA MEJOR DE MICHOACAN received an A, scoring 94 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Jun 15, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]

Inspection score

94/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The report states: “&2Observed employee drinks in unapproved containers stored on food prep surfaces (2ND REPEAT OF VIOLATION.” [2]

The inspector also observed food debris in front hand sink, and back handsink blocked by mop bucket A handwashing sink shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for employee use and not used for purposes other than handwashing. [3]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 2 of 2 findings

  1. Eating, drinking and tobacco use

    Item 2-2B
    &2Observed employee drinks in unapproved containers stored on food prep surfaces (2ND REPEAT OF VIOLATION. IF VIOLATION IS OBSERVED ON NEXT INSPECTION PERMIT MAY BE SUSPENDED.) Employees shall consume food and drink only in approved designated areas separate from food preparation and serving areas, equipment or utensil areas and food storage areas (unless drinking from a single service beverage cup with a secure lid and straw that is handled to prevent contamination of the employee's hands, the container, exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens, unwrapped single-service and single-use articles). (C) Corrective Actions: Drinks discarded or relocated
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .03(5)(k)1

    &2Observed employee drinks in unapproved containers stored on food prep surfaces (2ND REPEAT OF VIOLATION. IF VIOLATION IS OBSERVED ON NEXT INSPECTION PERMIT MAY BE SUSPENDED.) Employees shall consume food and drink only in approved designated areas separate from food preparation and serving areas, equipment or utensil areas and food storage areas (unless drinking from a single service beverage cup with a secure lid and straw that is handled to prevent contamination of the employee's hands, the container, exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens, unwrapped single-service and single-use articles). (C) Corrective Actions: Drinks discarded or relocated
    Official report · Item 2-2B ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Handwashing

    Item 2-2D
    Observed food debris in front hand sink, and back handsink blocked by mop bucket A handwashing sink shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for employee use and not used for purposes other than handwashing. An automatic handwashing facility shall be used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. (Pf) Corrective Actions: sink cleaned mop bucket relocated
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .06(2)(o)

    Observed food debris in front hand sink, and back handsink blocked by mop bucket A handwashing sink shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for employee use and not used for purposes other than handwashing. An automatic handwashing facility shall be used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. (Pf) Corrective Actions: sink cleaned mop bucket relocated
    Official report · Item 2-2D ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    94/100A
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
0BD7B8AA-A974-4EF4-88DC-9D66A7E00470
Facility ID
7C2C3980-11AE-4149-9ED5-CA2E31E2D2EB
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked