NickO Report
CitiesExplore

COM GA HOUSTON scored 80; newer inspection records 53

Inspected

3350 Steve Reynolds Blvd Suite 305 Duluth, GA 30096

Map ↗

COM GA HOUSTON received a B, scoring 80 out of 100, in a Gwinnett County food-service inspection on Jun 15, 2026. The official report lists three findings. [1]

Inspection score

80/100Grade BOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed sliced jalapenos in a prep cooler in individually portioned containers that had a white, mold-like substance on the cut surfaces of several slices. [2]

The inspector also observed two containers of cooked chicken that were cold holding at greater than 41F. [3]

A separate finding described cut lettuce, noodles and cut cabbage that was not cooling at a sufficient cooling rate. [4]

A newer inspection in our records, dated Sep 15, 2026, lists 53 out of 100, grade U. The findings above belong to the Jun 15, 2026 inspection. [5]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 3 of 3 findings

  1. Food condition

    Item 3-1C
    Observed sliced jalapenos in a prep cooler in individually portioned containers that had a white, mold-like substance on the cut surfaces of several slices. Food shall be safe, unadulterated, and honestly presented. (P) Corrective Actions: Jalapenos were discarded.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(1)

    Observed sliced jalapenos in a prep cooler in individually portioned containers that had a white, mold-like substance on the cut surfaces of several slices. Food shall be safe, unadulterated, and honestly presented. (P) Corrective Actions: Jalapenos were discarded.
    Official report · Item 3-1C ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  2. Cold holding

    Item 6-1A
    Observed two containers of cooked chicken that were cold holding at greater than 41F. See temperature log. Time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 41°F (5°C) or below. (P) Corrective Actions: Chicken was discarded.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(6)(f)

    Observed two containers of cooked chicken that were cold holding at greater than 41F. See temperature log. Time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 41°F (5°C) or below. (P) Corrective Actions: Chicken was discarded.
    Official report · Item 6-1A ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.
  3. Cooling time and temperature

    Item 6-1C
    Observed cut lettuce, noodles and cut cabbage that was not cooling at a sufficient cooling rate. See temperature log. TCS foods being cooled from 135°F to 70°F in 2 hours MUST cool 0.54°F per minute (roughly 32.5°F per hour). TCS foods being cooled from 70°F to 41°F MUST cool 7.25°F per hour (0.121°F per min or 29°F in 4 hours). Corrective Actions: Discussed proper cooling methods with person-in-charge (PIC). PIC moved cooling foods to the freezer to facility a more rapid cooling rate.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code .04(6)(d)

    Observed cut lettuce, noodles and cut cabbage that was not cooling at a sufficient cooling rate. See temperature log. TCS foods being cooled from 135°F to 70°F in 2 hours MUST cool 0.54°F per minute (roughly 32.5°F per hour). TCS foods being cooled from 70°F to 41°F MUST cool 7.25°F per hour (0.121°F per min or 29°F in 4 hours). Corrective Actions: Discussed proper cooling methods with person-in-charge (PIC). PIC moved cooling foods to the freezer to facility a more rapid cooling rate.
    Official report · Item 6-1C ↗
    No correction or repeat marker recorded.

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 2

Official history ↗
  1. Newer record
    53/100U
    Report
  2. This report
    80/100B
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Gwinnett County
Inspection ID
01BE4B17-2870-455B-BA09-655B4C0698B1
Facility ID
2939370B-2775-4BF6-9275-71E14BA76B00
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Gwinnett County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked