NickO ReportPowered by Oxford Bureau

Metro Atlanta News

CitiesExplore

Hashtag India scores 92; inspectors cite handwashing issues

Inspected

6650 ROSWELL RD STE 40 SANDY SPRINGS, GA 30328

Map ↗

Hashtag India received an A, scoring 92 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Nov 3, 2026. The official report lists three findings. [1]

Inspection score

92/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

Inspection purpose: Routine

The inspector observed food being dumped inside handwashing sink near prep line inside main kitchen. [2]

The inspector also observed food employee wearing bracelets during food prep in front food service. [3]

A separate finding described several bowls and containers wet stacking on shelf inside main kitchen. [4]

The report marks three findings as corrected on site. [5]

8 points lower than the previous inspection in our records: 100/100 on Jul 13, 2026. Intervening inspections may be missing.

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 3 of 3 findings

  1. Handwashing

    Item 2-2D
    Observed food being dumped inside handwashing sink near prep line inside main kitchen. CA: 511-6-1.06(2)(o) - Using a Handwashing Sink- Operation & maintenance (Pf) (o) Using a Handwashing Sink.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.06(2)(o)

    Observed food being dumped inside handwashing sink near prep line inside main kitchen. CA: 511-6-1.06(2)(o) - Using a Handwashing Sink- Operation & maintenance (Pf) (o) Using a Handwashing Sink. 1. A handwashing sink shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for employee use. Pf 2. A handwashing facility may not be used for purposes other than handwashing. Pf 3. An automatic handwashing facility shall be used in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Pf COS: PIC cleaned and sanitized hand sink. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 2-2D ↗
    Corrected on siteNew violation

  2. Personal cleanliness

    Item 12B
    Observed food employee wearing bracelets during food prep in front food service. CA: Food employees may not wear jewelry during food prep.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.03(5)(g)

    Observed food employee wearing bracelets during food prep in front food service. CA: Food employees may not wear jewelry during food prep. COS Removed jewelry. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 12B ↗
    Corrected on siteNew violation

  3. Utensil, equipment and linen storage

    Item 14B
    Observed several bowls and containers wet stacking on shelf inside main kitchen. CA: (a) Equipment and Utensils, Air-Drying Required.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.05(10)(a)

    Observed several bowls and containers wet stacking on shelf inside main kitchen. CA: (a) Equipment and Utensils, Air-Drying Required. After cleaning and sanitizing, equipment and utensils: 1. Shall be air-dried or used after adequate draining before contact with food; and COS: Separated for air-drying Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 14B ↗
    Corrected on siteNew violation

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 2

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    92/100A
    Reading
  2. Earlier recordInitial inspection
    100/100A
    Report

Sources

01 / Primary source Official inspection & findings

Fulton County · Nov 3, 2026

02 / Same facility Official inspection history

Available records for this official facility

03 / How scoring works Georgia’s food-service rules
Record details & methodology
Authority
Fulton County
Inspection ID
57560746
Facility ID
13014841
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked