Metro Atlanta News
SOUTH FORK SOUL FOOD received an A, scoring 94 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Oct 30, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed multiple cutting boards with significant grooves/scores and black mold-like marks. [2]
The inspector also observed no sanitizer testing equipment on site. [3]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. One finding is marked as a repeat violation. [4]
Showing 2 of 2 findings
Observed multiple cutting boards with significant grooves/scores and black mold-like marks. Cos by throwing away.
Code 511-6-1.05(7)(a)1
Observed multiple cutting boards with significant grooves/scores and black mold-like marks. Cos by throwing away. 511-6-1.05(7)(a)1 - Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces,& Utensils (Pf) (7) Cleaning of Equipment and Utensils. (a) Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. 1. Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. Pf. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.Official report · Item 4-2B ↗
Observed no sanitizer testing equipment on site. PIC advised to maintain proper sanitizing testing devices on site.
Code 511-6-1.05(6)(p)
Observed no sanitizer testing equipment on site. PIC advised to maintain proper sanitizing testing devices on site. 511-6-1.05(6)(p) - Warewashing Equipment, Determining Chemical Sanitizer Concentration (Pf) (p) Warewashing Equipment, Determining Chemical Sanitizer Concentration. Concentration of the sanitizing solution shall be accurately determined by using a test kit or other device. Pf. Repeat Violation.Official report · Item 15B ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Fulton County · Oct 30, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked
