Metro Atlanta News
J & J Fish & Chicken received an A, scoring 97 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Oct 30, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed various fish types in containers without common name on each label (though dates were provided), in the walk-in cooler. [2]
1 point higher than the previous inspection in our records: 96/100 on Jun 10, 2026. Intervening inspections may be missing.
Showing 1 of 1 findings
Observed various fish types in containers without common name on each label (though dates were provided), in the walk-in cooler. 511-6-1.04(4)(d) - Food Storage Containers Identified with Common Name of Food (C) (d) Food Storage Containers, Identified with Common Name of Food.
Code 511-6-1.04(4)(d)
Observed various fish types in containers without common name on each label (though dates were provided), in the walk-in cooler. 511-6-1.04(4)(d) - Food Storage Containers Identified with Common Name of Food (C) (d) Food Storage Containers, Identified with Common Name of Food. Except for containers holding food that can be readily and unmistakably recognized, such as dry pasta, working containers holding food or food ingredients that are removed from their original packages for use in the food establishment, such as cooking oils, flour, herbs, potato flakes, salt, spices, and sugar shall be clearly and legibly identified, in English, with the common name of the food. Advised Pic to label every container with the food item’s common name in walk-in cooler. New Violation. Correct By: 11/02/2026Official report · Item 10D ↗
Correct by
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Fulton County · Oct 30, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked
