NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Sweetgreen scores 94; inspectors cite personal cleanliness issues

Inspected

1175 PEACHTREE ST NE ATLANTA, GA 30361

Map ↗

Sweetgreen received an A, scoring 94 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Sep 3, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]

Inspection score

94/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed an employee preparing food without wearing beard guard CA: PIC immediately had employee put on beard guard Corrected On-Site. [2]

The inspector also observed dead pest in online prep area CA: The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to minimize their presence on the premises by: 1. [3]

The report marks one finding as corrected on site. [4]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 2 of 2 findings

  1. Personal cleanliness

    Item 12B
    Observed employee preparing food without wearing beard guard CA: PIC immediately had employee put on beard guard Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.03(5)(j)

    Observed employee preparing food without wearing beard guard CA: PIC immediately had employee put on beard guard Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 12B ↗
    Corrected on siteNew violation

  2. Pest control

    Item 18
    Observed dead pest in online prep area CA: The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to minimize their presence on the premises by: 1. Routinely inspecting incoming shipments of food and supplies; 2.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.07(5)(k)

    Observed dead pest in online prep area CA: The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to minimize their presence on the premises by: 1. Routinely inspecting incoming shipments of food and supplies; 2. Routinely inspecting the premises for evidence of pests; 3. Using methods, if pests are found, such as trapping devices or other means of pest control as specified under subsections (6)(e), (6)(m), and (6)(n) of this Rule; Pf and 4. Eliminating harborage conditions. New Violation. Correct By: 09/13/2026
    Official report · Item 18 ↗
    New violation

    Correct by

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    94/100A
    Reading

Sources

01 / Primary source Official inspection & findings

Fulton County · Sep 3, 2026

02 / Same facility Official inspection history

Available records for this official facility

03 / How scoring works Georgia’s food-service rules
Record details & methodology
Authority
Fulton County
Inspection ID
57550401
Facility ID
12767746
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked