Inspection summary
The inspector observed the chlorine concentration in the dish machine was reading 0 after several runs. [2]
The inspector also observed ROP being used in the kitchen without having a variance. [3]
Sugo Restaurant & Tapas received an A, scoring 92 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Jul 31, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]
The inspector observed the chlorine concentration in the dish machine was reading 0 after several runs. [2]
The inspector also observed ROP being used in the kitchen without having a variance. [3]
Showing 2 of 2 findings
Observed the chlorine concentration in the dish machine was reading 0 after several runs. (CA) Advised the PIC to have the dish machine adjusted so the correct concentration of sanitizer is being added during the final rinse.
Code 511-6-1.05(6)(n)
Observed the chlorine concentration in the dish machine was reading 0 after several runs. (CA) Advised the PIC to have the dish machine adjusted so the correct concentration of sanitizer is being added during the final rinse. A chemical sanitizer used in a sanitizing solution for a manual or mechanical operation at contact times specified under subsection (8)(b)3 of this Rule shall meet the requirements specified in DPH Rule 511-6-1-.07(6)(g), shall be used in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered label use instructions P New Violation. Correct By: 08/03/2026Official report · Item 4-2B ↗
Correct by
Observed ROP being used in the kitchen without having a variance. (CA) Advised the PIC that they must have a variance before using ROP.
Code 511-6-1.04(6)(j)
Observed ROP being used in the kitchen without having a variance. (CA) Advised the PIC that they must have a variance before using ROP. Packaging time/temperature control for safety food using a reduced oxygen packaging method except where the growth and toxin formation of Clostridium botulinum and growth of Listeria monocytogenes are controlled as specified under (k) of this Rule; Pf New Violation. Correct By: 08/11/2026Official report · Item 9-2 ↗
Correct by
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Fulton County · Jul 31, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked