NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Thai Emerald receives A in Fulton County health inspection

Inspected

540 WEST CROSSVILLE STE 201 ROSWELL, GA 30075

Map ↗

Thai Emerald received an A, scoring 99 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Jul 23, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]

Inspection score

99/100Grade AOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed an employee drinks in RIC with restaurant food. [2]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 1 of 1 findings

  1. Ventilation and lighting

    Item 17D
    Observed employee drinks in RIC with restaurant food. Designated Areas for Employee Activity.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.07(4)(b)

    Observed employee drinks in RIC with restaurant food. Designated Areas for Employee Activity. 1. Areas designated for employees to eat, drink, use tobacco products and electronic devices shall be located so that food, equipment, linens, and single-service and single-use articles are protected from contamination. 2. Lockers or other suitable facilities shall be located in a designated room or area where contamination of food, equipment, utensils, linens and single-service and single-use articles cannot occur. C/A COS: Ensure all employee food and drinks are in a single designated spot. New Violation. Correct By: 07/26/2026
    Official report · Item 17D ↗
    New violation

    Correct by

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    99/100A
    Reading

Sources

01 / Primary source Official inspection & findings

Fulton County · Jul 23, 2026

02 / Same facility Official inspection history

Available records for this official facility

03 / How scoring works Georgia’s food-service rules
Record details & methodology
Authority
Fulton County
Inspection ID
57543012
Facility ID
883796
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked