NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Subway scores 81; inspectors cite handwashing issues

Inspected

1170 CRESCENT AVE ATLANTA, GA 30309

Map ↗

Subway received a B, scoring 81 out of 100, in a Fulton County food-service inspection on Jul 6, 2026. The official report lists four findings. [1]

Inspection score

81/100Grade BOfficial inspection

Inspection summary

The inspector observed the hand sink in the back prep area as not functional. [2]

The inspector also observed sliced tomatoes in the WIC with mold on in. The note records an on-site correction: “PIC discarded the tomatoes 511-6-1.04(1) - Safe, unadulterated and Honestly Presented (P) (1) Condition.” [3]

A separate finding described failure to have updated food service permit. [4]

The report marks one finding as corrected on site. Two findings are marked as repeat violations. [5]

What inspectors found

Read the official report

Showing 4 of 4 findings

  1. Handwashing

    Item 2-2D
    Observed the hand sink in the back prep area as not functional. EHS attempted to wash his hands and no water came out when knobs were turned.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.06(2)(o)

    Observed the hand sink in the back prep area as not functional. EHS attempted to wash his hands and no water came out when knobs were turned. CA: PIC was advised to have the sinks repaired so that they are operable and able to wash their hands in that prep area. 511-6-1.06(2)(o) - Using a Handwashing Sink- Operation & maintenance (Pf) (o) Using a Handwashing Sink. 1. A handwashing sink shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for employee use. Pf 2. A handwashing facility may not be used for purposes other than handwashing. Pf 3. An automatic handwashing facility shall be used in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Pf New Violation. Correct By: 07/16/2026
    Official report · Item 2-2D ↗
    New violation

    Correct by

  2. Food condition

    Item 3-1C
    Observed sliced tomatoes in the WIC with mold on in. COS:PIC discarded the tomatoes 511-6-1.04(1) - Safe, unadulterated and Honestly Presented (P) (1) Condition.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.04(1)

    Observed sliced tomatoes in the WIC with mold on in. COS:PIC discarded the tomatoes 511-6-1.04(1) - Safe, unadulterated and Honestly Presented (P) (1) Condition. Food shall be safe, unadulterated, and honestly presented. P Corrected On-Site. New Violation.
    Official report · Item 3-1C ↗
    Corrected on siteNew violation
  3. Required permits and notices

    Item 13A
    Observed failure to have updated food service permit. CA: PIC and establishment was issued a legal notice to obtain a valid food service permit from Fulton County Board of Health.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.02(1)(f)(1)

    Observed failure to have updated food service permit. CA: PIC and establishment was issued a legal notice to obtain a valid food service permit from Fulton County Board of Health. Repeat Violation. Correct By: 07/07/2026
    Official report · Item 13A ↗
    Repeat violation

    Correct by

  4. Pest control

    Item 18
    During the inspection EHS observed the establishment had a heavy presence of gnats throughout the establishment. CA: PIC was advised to have pest control to come out and service the establishment.
    Inspector’s full note

    Code 511-6-1.07(5)(k)

    During the inspection EHS observed the establishment had a heavy presence of gnats throughout the establishment. CA: PIC was advised to have pest control to come out and service the establishment. Repeat Violation.
    Official report · Item 18 ↗
    Repeat violation

Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.

Inspection history 1

Official history ↗
  1. This report
    81/100B
    Reading

Sources

Record details & methodology
Authority
Fulton County
Inspection ID
57538946
Facility ID
2490209
Record captured
Venue address source
Official listing ·

Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.

Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.

History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.

This report comes from Fulton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.

Georgia’s grading scale
A
90–100
B
80–89
C
70–79
U
0–69
Georgia food-service rules ↗

Checked