Inspection summary
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed 3 flies and 2 fruit flies throughout kitchen and dining area. [2]
One finding is marked as a repeat violation. [3]
HK BBQ receives A in DeKalb County health inspection
HK BBQ received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a DeKalb County food-service inspection on Nov 2, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]
Inspection score
96/100Grade AOfficial inspectionWhat inspectors found
Showing 1 of 1 findings
Pest control
Item 18Observed 3 flies and 2 fruit flies throughout kitchen and dining area. Controlling Pests (Pf, C) (k) Controlling Pests.
Inspector’s full note
Code 511-6-1.07(5)(k)
Observed 3 flies and 2 fruit flies throughout kitchen and dining area. Controlling Pests (Pf, C) (k) Controlling Pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to minimize their presence on the premises by: 1. Routinely inspecting incoming shipments of food and supplies; 2. Routinely inspecting the premises for evidence of pests; 3. Using methods, if pests are found, such as trapping devices or other means of pest control as specified under subsections (6)(e), (6)(m), and (6)(n) of this Rule; Pf and 4. Eliminating harborage conditions. Discussed with PIC the need to eliminate sources of harborage to help control pests and to consult with a licensed pest control service. Repeat Violation.
Official report · Item 18 ↗Repeat violation
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Inspection history 1
Official history ↗- This report96/100AReading
Sources
01 / Primary source ↗Official inspection & findings
DeKalb County · Nov 2, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesRecord details & methodology
- Authority
- DeKalb County
- Inspection ID
- 57560512
- Facility ID
- 12302583
- Record captured
- Venue address source
- Official listing ·
Scores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from DeKalb County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Georgia’s grading scale
- A
- 90–100
- B
- 80–89
- C
- 70–79
- U
- 0–69
Checked