Metro Atlanta News
Whit's Of Georgia received an A, scoring 99 out of 100, in a Coweta County food-service inspection on Nov 4, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed toppings being stored in opened original cans which had rusted. [2]
The inspector also observed buildup in bottoms of reach-in coolers, oven, and microwave. [3]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. [4]
Showing 2 of 2 findings
Observed toppings being stored in opened original cans which had rusted. Utensils and food-contact surfaces of equipment shall be made of materials that do not allow the migration of deleterious substances or impart colors, odors, or tastes to food and under normal use conditions, and shall be: safe, durable, corrosion-resistant, and nonabsorbent.
Code 511-6-1.05(1)(a)
Observed toppings being stored in opened original cans which had rusted. Utensils and food-contact surfaces of equipment shall be made of materials that do not allow the migration of deleterious substances or impart colors, odors, or tastes to food and under normal use conditions, and shall be: safe, durable, corrosion-resistant, and nonabsorbent. Cans discarded during inspection. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.Official report · Item 15A ↗
Observed buildup in bottoms of reach-in coolers, oven, and microwave. Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues.
Code 511-6-1.05(7)(d)
Observed buildup in bottoms of reach-in coolers, oven, and microwave. Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. New Violation.Official report · Item 15C ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Coweta County · Nov 4, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Coweta County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked
