Metro Atlanta News
Frutta Bowls received a B, scoring 87 out of 100, in a Coweta County food-service inspection on Nov 4, 2026. The official report lists two findings. [1]
Inspection purpose: Routine
The inspector observed partially opened damaged can of tomatoes in reach-in cooler.PIC discarded during inspection. [2]
The inspector also observed food debris build-up in reach-in cooler, prep top cooler, and reach freezer. [3]
Showing 2 of 2 findings
Observed partially opened damaged can of tomatoes in reach-in cooler.PIC discarded during inspection. 511-6-1.04(3)(e) - Package Integrity (e) Package Integrity.
Code 511-6-1.04(3)(e)
Observed partially opened damaged can of tomatoes in reach-in cooler.PIC discarded during inspection. 511-6-1.04(3)(e) - Package Integrity (e) Package Integrity. Food packages shall be in good condition and protect the integrity of the contents so that the food is not exposed to adulteration or potential contaminants. New Violation.Official report · Item 3-1C ↗
Observed food debris build-up in reach-in cooler, prep top cooler, and reach freezer. Prep top cleaned during inspection will follow-up for reach-in cooler and freezer.
Code 511-6-1.05(7)(b)
Observed food debris build-up in reach-in cooler, prep top cooler, and reach freezer. Prep top cleaned during inspection will follow-up for reach-in cooler and freezer. Equipment is used for storage of packaged or unpackaged food, such as a reach-in refrigerator, and the equipment is cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues; New Violation.Official report · Item 4-2B ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Coweta County · Nov 4, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Coweta County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked
