Inspection summary
Inspection purpose: Routine
The report states: “PIC unable to provide verifiable evidence that food employees have been trained on the 9 major allergens, and procedures for dealing with allergies and allergic reactions.” [2]
Metro Atlanta News
FIVE GUYS received an A, scoring 96 out of 100, in a Cobb County food-service inspection on Nov 10, 2026. The official report lists one finding. [1]
Inspection purpose: Routine
The report states: “PIC unable to provide verifiable evidence that food employees have been trained on the 9 major allergens, and procedures for dealing with allergies and allergic reactions.” [2]
Showing 1 of 1 findings
PIC unable to provide verifiable evidence that food employees have been trained on the 9 major allergens, and procedures for dealing with allergies and allergic reactions. C/A: Employees are properly trained in food safety, including food allergy awareness, as it relates to their assigned duties.
Code 511-6-1.03(2)(a)-(n)(p),(q)
PIC unable to provide verifiable evidence that food employees have been trained on the 9 major allergens, and procedures for dealing with allergies and allergic reactions. C/A: Employees are properly trained in food safety, including food allergy awareness, as it relates to their assigned duties. Food allergy awareness includes describing foods identified as major food allergens and the symptoms that a major food allergen could cause in a sensitive individual who has an allergic reaction EHS provided Allergen Awareness. Facility to produce within 10 calendar days proof of allergen training. New Violation. Correct By: 11/20/2026Official report · Item 1-2A ↗
Correct by
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Cobb County · Nov 10, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Cobb County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked