Inspection summary
The report states: “No hot water at handwash sink in kitchen.” [2]
The inspector also observed daylight around back door. [3]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. Two findings are marked as repeat violations. [4]
Chill Spot 2.0 Taste of Flavor received an A, scoring 92 out of 100, in a Clayton County food-service inspection on Oct 15, 2026. The official report lists three findings. [1]
The report states: “No hot water at handwash sink in kitchen.” [2]
The inspector also observed daylight around back door. [3]
The report marks one finding as corrected on site. Two findings are marked as repeat violations. [4]
Showing 3 of 3 findings
No hot water at handwash sink in kitchen. Advised PIC that handwash shall have hot.
Code 511-6-1.06(2)(o)
No hot water at handwash sink in kitchen. Advised PIC that handwash shall have hot. COS PIC turned hot water line back on at hand wash sink. Corrected On-Site. New Violation.Official report · Item 2-2D ↗
Observed daylight around back door. Replace seal around back door and at base of door so to prevent entry of pest.
Code 511-6-1.07(2)(m)
Observed daylight around back door. Replace seal around back door and at base of door so to prevent entry of pest. Repeat Violation.Official report · Item 18 ↗
Observed daylight around back door. Replace seal around back door and at base of door so to prevent entry of pest.
Code 511-6-1.07(2)(m)
Observed daylight around back door. Replace seal around back door and at base of door so to prevent entry of pest. Repeat Violation.Official report · Item 18 ↗
Correction and repeat labels quote the report. An absent label leaves correction status unknown; a deadline does not confirm a correction.
Clayton County · Oct 15, 2026
02 / Same facility ↗Official inspection historyAvailable records for this official facility
03 / How scoring works ↗Georgia’s food-service rulesScores and findings describe the dated inspection, not current operating conditions. A correction deadline does not establish whether an issue remained unresolved afterward.
Findings quote the official report captured . “Corrected on site” and “repeat” reflect explicit report markers. “COS” and “CA” in the inspector’s notes refer to corrections and corrective actions; an instruction to act is not proof that it was completed.
History links the same official facility ID within the issuing authority and may omit intervening inspections. Same-day results have no inferred sequence. Report excerpts follow source order, not a severity ranking.
This report comes from Clayton County. History includes only this authority’s exact facility ID.
Checked