NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Project history · Sandy Springs · V-26-43

sport court

Follow the official record for case V-26-43: filings, scheduled hearings, recorded actions and the reporting that connects them.

Dated records · Aug 5, 2026 – Oct 2, 2026

Official record ↗

Case summary

This retained record is not automatically updated. Check the linked official sources and related reporting for later developments.

A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.

Project site
116 Hardeman RoadSource · page 2 ↗ · Find on map ↗
What the record describes
116 Hardeman Road - Request for a Variance from Sec. 7.8.24. and 2.3.1. to allow for a sport court to encroach into the setbacks and to exceed the maximum lot coverage.Source · page 2 ↗
Project named in the record
sport courtSource · page 2 ↗
What is proposed
sport courtSource · page 2 ↗

Some details have no verified date. Their source links remain available.

Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.

Case timeline

Oldest to newest, using dates in the official sources. Scheduled hearings do not establish that a hearing took place.

  1. on the agendaV-26-43

    Direct evidence link unavailable

  2. filedOfficial filing record

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

Supporting records

These facts and documents have no separately verified date for the timeline. Dates mentioned in their text retain their original context.

  • case referencedAgenda

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

  • Source factHearing Date: 2026-08-05

    Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗

  • Source factSite Address: 116 Hardeman Road

    Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗

  • Source factProposal Summary: 116 Hardeman Road - Request for a Variance from Sec. 7.8.24. and 2.3.1. to allow for a sport court to encroach into the setbacks and to exceed the maximum lot coverage.

    Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗

  • Source factCommittee Action: Deferred by unanimous vote.

    Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗

  • Source factProject Name: sport court

    Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗

  • Source factPublic Subject: Request for a Variance

    Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗

  • Source factProposal Purpose: sport court

    Exact evidence · page 2 · Official record ↗

NickO Report archive

Reporting history

Newest published first. Each article reflects what was known at publication. Reports are linked by verified case identity or a source-cited reference to this case; an article may discuss more than one case.

  1. Published · References this case

    Hardeman Road sport-court variance listed for Nov. 4 after deferral →

    The request seeks setback and lot-coverage exceptions. Staff says the site is in a sensitive drainage area requiring extra stormwater mitigation.

  2. Published · Case reporting

    A variance request seeks to let a sport court encroach into setbacks →

    The proposal also seeks to exceed maximum lot coverage.

  3. Published · Case reporting

    Variance request names a sport court →

    The case record identifies a sport court as the proposal's purpose.

  4. Published · Case reporting

    A variance request names a sport court →

    The Sandy Springs case centers on a request for a variance tied to a sport court.

  5. Published · Case reporting

    Sandy Springs listed a sport court variance request →

    The Aug. 5 agenda item is identified as a Request for a Variance for case V-26-43.

  6. Published · Case reporting

    A variance request has been filed for a sport court. →

    The Aug. 6 case filing lists a request for a variance, with the proposal purpose identified as a sport court.

Source coverage

This history grows as official records are verified and reporting is published. It may not include every filing or later action. An absent record does not mean an action never occurred.

Source follow-up: Awaiting Final Decision.

Missing records

  • Final decision — missing from our current sources
  • Hearing — missing from our current sources
  • Minutes — missing from our current sources
  • Recommendation — missing from our current sources

Case coverage

Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.

  1. Filing / applicationCovered
    Exact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
  2. Agenda / hearingCovered
    An accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
  3. Packet + attachmentsSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  4. Minutes + voteSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  5. Recommendation / decisionSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  6. Follow-up changeSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Packet incompleteNo packet or attachment evidence links are available.The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.

Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →