NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Project history · Powder Springs · PZ26-022

premium, master-planned mixed-use site

Follow the official record for case PZ26-022: filings, scheduled hearings, recorded actions and the reporting that connects them.

Dated records · Aug 23, 2026

Official record ↗

Case summary

This retained record is not automatically updated. Check the linked official sources and related reporting for later developments.

A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.

Road or project area
intersection of Brownsville Road and C H James ParkwaySource · page 1 ↗ · Find on map ↗
Existing zoning in this record
CRC and R-30Source · page 1 ↗
Project named in the record
premium, master-planned mixed-use siteSource · page 5 ↗
What is proposed
mixed-useSource · page 5 ↗
Requested zoning
MXUSource · page 4 ↗
Housing units per acre
15.75Source · page 4 ↗

Some details have no verified date. Their source links remain available.

Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.

Zoning definitions

A verified definition for CRC and R-30, MXU is unavailable for this jurisdiction and case date.

Case timeline

Oldest to newest, using dates in the official sources. Scheduled hearings do not establish that a hearing took place.

  1. filedOfficial filing record

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

Supporting records

These facts and documents have no separately verified date for the timeline. Dates mentioned in their text retain their original context.

  • Source factFrom Zoning: CRC and R-30

    Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗

  • Source factHearing Date: 2026-08-24

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

  • Source factProject Name: premium, master-planned mixed-use site

    Exact evidence · page 5 · Official record ↗

  • Source factProposal Purpose: mixed-use

    Exact evidence · page 5 · Official record ↗

  • Source factPublic Subject: City of Powder Springs’s Comprehensive Plan

    Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗

  • Source factLocation Description: intersection of Brownsville Road and C H James Parkway

    Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗

  • Source factTo Zoning: MXU

    Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗

  • Source factDensity Units Per Acre: 15.75

    Exact evidence · page 4 · Official record ↗

NickO Report archive

Reporting history

Newest published first. Each article reflects what was known at publication. Reports are linked by verified case identity or a source-cited reference to this case; an article may discuss more than one case.

  1. Published · Case reporting

    Brownsville Road plan proposes homes and five commercial sites →

    The rezoning request covers five properties at the intersection of Brownsville Road and C H James Parkway.

  2. Published · Case reporting

    Master-planned proposal would combine homes and shops →

    The planning recommendation cites a density of approximately 15.75 homes per acre as of June 17, 2026.

  3. Published · Case reporting

    Homes-and-shops proposal calls for about 16 homes per acre →

    The planning recommendation says the master-planned development may fit Powder Springs’ Comprehensive Plan.

  4. Published · Case reporting

    Master-planned homes and shops proposed in Powder Springs →

    Staff recommended a zoning change for the project, with residential density of about 15.75 homes per acre.

  5. Published · Case reporting

    Powder Springs planning recommendation seeks MXU zoning for a 15.75-unit-per-acre mixed-use site →

    The proposal describes a premium, master-planned mixed-use site and identifies MXU as the requested zoning designation.

Source coverage

This history grows as official records are verified and reporting is published. It may not include every filing or later action. An absent record does not mean an action never occurred.

Missing records

  • Agenda — missing from our current sources
  • Final decision — missing from our current sources
  • Hearing — missing from our current sources
  • Minutes — missing from our current sources
  • Recommendation — missing from our current sources

Case coverage

Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.

  1. Filing / applicationCovered
    Exact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
  2. Agenda / hearingCovered
    An accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
  3. Packet + attachmentsSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  4. Minutes + voteSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  5. Recommendation / decisionSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  6. Follow-up changeSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Packet incompleteNo packet or attachment evidence links are available.The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.

Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →