NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Project history · Fulton County · 26-0348

Easement

Follow the official record for case 26-0348: filings, scheduled hearings, recorded actions and the reporting that connects them.

Dated records · Aug 3, 2026

Official record ↗

Case summary

This retained record is not automatically updated. Check the linked official sources and related reporting for later developments.

A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.

Area (square feet)
90,120Source ↗
What is proposed
EasementSource ↗
What the record describes
water easement dedication for Fernleaf ProjectSource ↗

Some details have no verified date. Their source links remain available.

Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.

Case timeline

Oldest to newest, using dates in the official sources. Scheduled hearings do not establish that a hearing took place.

  1. filedOfficial filing record

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

Supporting records

These facts and documents have no separately verified date for the timeline. Dates mentioned in their text retain their original context.

NickO Report archive

Reporting history

Newest published first. Each article reflects what was known at publication. Reports are linked by verified case identity or a source-cited reference to this case; an article may discuss more than one case.

  1. Published · Case reporting

    Fernleaf Project filing covers a 90,120-square-foot water easement dedication →

    The Fulton County case is an official filing for a water easement dedication tied to the Fernleaf Project, with a recommendation to request approval.

  2. Published · Case reporting

    A request for approval covers a 90,120-square-foot water easement dedication for the Fernleaf Project. →

    The county action lists the item as an easement and records a June 17, 2026, hearing date.

  3. Published · Case reporting

    An official filing records a 90,120-square-foot water easement dedication for Fernleaf Project. →

    The county development item lists “Request approval” as its recommendation.

  4. Published · Case reporting

    Approval requested for Fernleaf Project water easement dedication →

    The record lists 90,120 square feet and a June 17, 2026 hearing date, which preceded the publication date.

  5. Published · Case reporting

    90,120-square-foot water easement dedication listed for Fernleaf Project →

    The county development item carries a recommendation to request approval for the easement dedication.

  6. Published · Case reporting

    A filed record lists a 90,120-square-foot water easement dedication for Fernleaf Project. →

    The county development item identifies the proposal purpose as “Easement,” gives the recommendation as “Request approval,” and lists a June 17, 2026 hearing date, which precedes the Aug. 3, 2026 publication date.

Source coverage

This history grows as official records are verified and reporting is published. It may not include every filing or later action. An absent record does not mean an action never occurred.

Missing records

  • Agenda — missing from our current sources
  • Final decision — missing from our current sources
  • Hearing — missing from our current sources
  • Minutes — missing from our current sources
  • Recommendation — missing from our current sources

Case coverage

Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.

  1. Filing / applicationCovered
    Exact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
  2. Agenda / hearingCovered
    An accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
  3. Packet + attachmentsUnavailable
    No active or partial launch source declares this checkpoint.
  4. Minutes + voteSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  5. Recommendation / decisionCovered
    An accepted official recommendation fact is linked to this case.
  6. Follow-up changeSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Packet incompleteNo packet or attachment evidence links are available.No active or partial launch source declares this checkpoint.

Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →