NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Project history · Atlanta · V-26-101

Case V-26-101

Follow the official record for case V-26-101: filings, scheduled hearings, recorded actions and the reporting that connects them.

Dated records · Sep 4, 2026 – Sep 16, 2026

Official record ↗

Case summary

This retained record is not automatically updated. Check the linked official sources and related reporting for later developments.

A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.

Staff recommendation
recommend_denialSource ↗

Some details have no verified date. Their source links remain available.

Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.

Case timeline

Oldest to newest, using dates in the official sources. Scheduled hearings do not establish that a hearing took place.

  1. filedOfficial filing record

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

  2. filedOfficial filing record

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

Supporting records

These facts and documents have no separately verified date for the timeline. Dates mentioned in their text retain their original context.

NickO Report archive

Reporting history

Newest published first. Each article reflects what was known at publication. Reports are linked by verified case identity or a source-cited reference to this case; an article may discuss more than one case.

  1. Published · References this case

    Foxcroft parking request set for Nov. 5 review after staff urged denial →

    A September report says the front-yard parking pad and drive were already built. Staff urged denial, but the board postponed the request.

  2. Published · References this case

    Foxcroft parking request set for Nov. 5 review after staff urged denial →

    A September report says the front-yard parking pad and drive were already built. Staff cited potential access hazards and recommended denying the exceptions.

  3. Published · References this case

    43-foot driveway request on Foxcroft Road set for Nov. 5 zoning review →

    The application seeks more than twice the listed 20-foot width allowance, plus permission for a parking pad in the required front yard.

  4. Published · Case reporting

    Staff recommends denial of front-yard parking pad request →

    The V-26-101 variance case concerns a parking pad in the required front yard, with a hearing date of Sept. 3.

Source coverage

This history grows as official records are verified and reporting is published. It may not include every filing or later action. An absent record does not mean an action never occurred.

Missing records

  • Agenda — missing from our current sources
  • Final decision — missing from our current sources
  • Hearing — missing from our current sources
  • Minutes — missing from our current sources
  • Recommendation — missing from our current sources

Case coverage

Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.

  1. Filing / applicationCovered
    Exact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
  2. Agenda / hearingCovered
    An accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
  3. Packet + attachmentsSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  4. Minutes + voteSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  5. Recommendation / decisionCovered
    An accepted official recommendation fact is linked to this case.
  6. Follow-up changeSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Packet incompleteNo packet or attachment evidence links are available.The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.

Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →