NickO Report
CitiesExplore

Project history · Atlanta · V-26-095

special exception to increase the height of a privacy fence

Follow the official record for case V-26-095: filings, scheduled hearings, recorded actions and the reporting that connects them.

Dated records · Sep 4, 2026 – Sep 16, 2026

Official record ↗

Case summary

This retained record is not automatically updated. Check the linked official sources and related reporting for later developments.

A proposal or recommendation does not establish approval.

Road or project area
fronting 49.98 feet on the west side of Holiday Avenue and beginning at the southwest intersection of Seaboard Avenue and Holiday Avenue.Source · page 1 ↗ · Find on map ↗
Project site
152 Holiday Avenue, N.E.Source · page 1 ↗ · Find on map ↗
What the record describes
a special exception to increase the height of a privacy fence (more that 50% opacity) from 6 feet to 8 feet in the rear and side yards for property located at 152 Holiday Avenue, N.E.Source · page 1 ↗
Project named in the record
special exception to increase the height of a privacy fenceSource · page 8 ↗
Existing zoning in this record
R-5/BLSource · page 1 ↗
What is proposed
privacy fenceSource · page 8 ↗
Recorded outcome
approvedSource ↗
Staff recommendation
recommend_approvalSource ↗

Some details have no verified date. Their source links remain available.

Final-decision evidence is incomplete. The timeline may contain individual actions or recommendations. Check the official record for the complete decision and any later action.

Zoning definitions

A verified definition for R-5/BL is unavailable for this jurisdiction and case date.

Case timeline

Oldest to newest, using dates in the official sources. Scheduled hearings do not establish that a hearing took place.

  1. filedOfficial filing record

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

  2. filedOfficial filing record

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

Supporting records

These facts and documents have no separately verified date for the timeline. Dates mentioned in their text retain their original context.

  • Source factProposal Summary: a special exception to increase the height of a privacy fence (more that 50% opacity) from 6 feet to 8 feet in the rear and side yards for property located at 152 Holiday Avenue, N.E.

    Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗

  • Source factHearing Date: 2026-09-03

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

  • Source factLocation Description: fronting 49.98 feet on the west side of Holiday Avenue and beginning at the southwest intersection of Seaboard Avenue and Holiday Avenue.

    Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗

  • Source factProject Name: special exception to increase the height of a privacy fence

    Exact evidence · page 8 · Official record ↗

  • Source factFrom Zoning: R-5/BL

    Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗

  • Source factProposal Purpose: privacy fence

    Exact evidence · page 8 · Official record ↗

  • Source factPublic Subject: privacy fence

    Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗

  • Source factRecommendation: NPU N: Approval

    Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗

  • Source factFinal Outcome: approved

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

  • Source factSite Address: 152 Holiday Avenue, N.E.

    Exact evidence · page 1 · Official record ↗

  • Source factStaff Recommendation: recommend_approval

    Official evidence linked · Official record ↗

NickO Report archive

Reporting history

Newest published first. Each article reflects what was known at publication. Reports are linked by verified case identity or a source-cited reference to this case; an article may discuss more than one case.

  1. Published · Case reporting

    Taller privacy fence request approved →

    The request sought a special exception to increase the privacy fence’s height, and staff recommended approval for the Sept. 3 hearing.

  2. Published · Case reporting

    Variance case V-26-095 records an approved outcome after staff recommended approval →

    The approval was recorded after the Sept. 3 hearing, turning the case's staff recommendation into an approved outcome.

Source coverage

This history grows as official records are verified and reporting is published. It may not include every filing or later action. An absent record does not mean an action never occurred.

Missing records

  • Agenda — missing from our current sources
  • Final decision — missing from our current sources
  • Hearing — missing from our current sources
  • Minutes — missing from our current sources
  • Recommendation — missing from our current sources

Case coverage

Covered means we have linked official evidence for that step. Source gap means we track that type of record but have not verified it for this case.

  1. Filing / applicationCovered
    Exact accepted official evidence is linked to this case.
  2. Agenda / hearingCovered
    An accepted official hearing-date fact is linked to this case.
  3. Packet + attachmentsSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  4. Minutes + voteSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
  5. Recommendation / decisionCovered
    An accepted official outcome fact is linked to this case.
  6. Follow-up changeSource gap
    The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.
Document coverage details
Packet incompleteNo packet or attachment evidence links are available.The launch source declares this checkpoint, but no exact case-linked evidence is accepted yet.

Filings, agendas and recommendations are not final decisions. Methodology →